Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See also Brown v. State, 741 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (allowing assessment of twelve points each time a new felony conviction triggers a community sanction violation). 1999See Brown v. State, No. 98-3051, 741 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Williams v. State, 720 So.2d 590 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). | 2 | 2 |
Kelly v. Stategreen2 sentences2008P. 3.704(d)(16); see Kelly, 706 So.2d at 397 . 1998Kelly, 706 So.2d at 396-97 . | 1 | 2 |
Sanders v. Stategreen1 sentence2018Consequently, a scoresheet prepared for sentencing upon revocation necessarily differs from the scoresheet prepared at Mr. Turner's original sentencing, as the revocation scoresheet was required to include community sanction violation points. - 14 - See Sanders v. State, 35 So. 3d 864, 869 (Fla. 2010) ("As a result of these community sanction violation points, the scoresheet prepared for a sentencing upon revocation of probation necessarily will differ from the scoresheet prepared for the original sentencing. | 1 | 1 |
Wynn v. Stategreen1 sentence2014P. 3.704(d)(16); § 921.0024(b), Fla. Stat. (2010) (stating that community sanction violation points “are assessed for each community sanction violation”); Bell v. State, 49 So.3d 340, 341 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (reversing and remanding for the correction of the score-sheet and resentencing, as the defendant’s “seoresheet erroneously contained six extra points for a community sanction violation, apparently based on the first affidavit of violation that had been dismissed”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McGregor v. State
green
1 sentence2001A much closer question was recently decided by our supreme court in McGregor v. State, 789 So.2d 976 (Fla.2001), in holding that defendant's date of release from prison under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act which enhanced his sentence would not require a jury determination. [16] This is because, said the court, defendant's sentence was not enhanced "beyond the prescribed statutory maximum." We cannot tell from McGregor (or from the appellate decision certifying the issue) when McGregor's offense occurred. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Williams v. State
green
1 sentence1999See Brown v. State, No. 98-3051, 741 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Williams v. State, 720 So.2d 590 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.