Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1981–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Benardo v. DOR EX REL. REILLYgreen1 sentence2006See Benardo v. Dep't of Revenue, 819 So.2d 161, 164-64 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Brod v. Jernigangreen1 sentence1992However, in doing so, we note our agreement with the hearing officer that the violation of Section 475.25(1)(e) was "minimal [and] technical ... arising from changes in statutes." We also believe that it is appropriate to set out the following quotation from Brod v. Jernigan, 188 So.2d 575, 581 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966), a case bearing many similarities to that now before us: Chapter 475 vests in the Florida Real Estate Commission a broad discretionary power and authority to supervise the privileged business of real estate broker and to deal firmly with those engaged in it, even to the point of takin | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Holmes v. Turlington
green
1 sentence1999Holmes, 480 So.2d at 152 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Adam Smith Enterprises, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF ENV. REG.
green
2 sentences1995In Adam Smith Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Regulation, 553 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), this court explained that the Hearing Officer's standard of review of an agency rule in a section 120.56 rule challenge "is whether the rule constitutes an invalid exercise of legislative authority, as that phrase is defined in Section 120.52(8) ..." Id. at 1274 n. 23. 1995In Adam Smith Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Regulation, 553 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), this court explained that the Hearing Officer's standard of review of an agency rule in a section 120.56 rule challenge "is whether the rule constitutes an invalid exercise of legislative authority, as that phrase is defined in Section 120.52(8) ..." Id. at 1274 n. 23. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Coca-Cola Co., Food Division v. State, Dept.
green
1 sentence1985Coca-Cola Co. v. State, Dept. of Citrus, 406 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Department of Corrections v. Adams
green
2 sentences1985While we would note the logic of the Hearing Officer's analysis of the law in both cases, neither Hearing Officer had the benefit of this court's recent decision in Department of Corrections v. Adams, 458 So.2d 354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). 1985In that case, it was held that "individual prisons are not agencies" and, thus, "enactments at the prison level are not subject to attack pursuant to chapter 120, Florida Statutes." Id. at 356 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Florida Canners Ass'n v. State, Dept. of Citrus
green
1 sentence1985DNR, on the other hand, argues that section 120.59(2) does not require the hearing officer to rule separately on each proposed finding submitted in a rule challenge proceeding because the requirements of that statute are inapplicable to rule challenges, citing Florida Canners Ass'n v. State, Dept. of Citrus, 371 So.2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), aff'd on other grounds sub nom. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
School Bd. of Orange County v. Palowitch
green
1 sentence1981In another context, the Commission has held that waiver must be "clear and unmistakable." Palowitch v. Orange County School Board, 3 FPER 280, 282 (1977), aff'd, 367 So.2d 730 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.