7 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hudson v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Id. at 258 (“Unfortunately, the trial court’s order on this resentencing is so lacking in detail that we cannot decide the proportionality issue.”). 2013Id. at 258 (“Unfortunately, the trial court’s order on this resentencing is so lacking in detail that we cannot decide the proportionality issue.”). | 2 | 2 |
CRYSTAL MOTOR CAR CO. OF HERNANDO v. Baileygreen1 sentence2013When there is no question “as to the making of the agreement or provision,” the motion should be granted, but if, as here, there is a “substantial issue,” then at least a summary hearing is needed. § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2012); see, e.g., Crystal Motor Car Co. of Hernando, LLC v. Bailey, 24 So.3d 789, 791 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (reversing denial of motion to compel arbitration for failure to hold evidentiary hearing when nonmovant claimed agreement was never signed and signature on document was forgery). | 1 | 1 |
Fuentes v. Shevingreen2 sentences1973However, the court in Fuentes did note that in a situation where state action was not involved, "the creditor could, of course, proceed without use of state power, through self-help by `distraining' the property before a judgment." 407 U.S. at 569, n. 12 , 92 S.Ct. at 1993 . 1973However, the court in Fuentes did note that in a situation where state action was not involved, "the creditor could, of course, proceed without use of state power, through self-help by `distraining' the property before a judgment." 407 U.S. at 569, n. 12 , 92 S.Ct. at 1993 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Campbell v. State
red
1 sentence1998Thus, this sentencing order is in violation of our 1990 decision in Campbell v. State, 571 So.2d 415 (Fla.1990). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State Ex Rel. Miami Herald Pub. v. McIntosh
green
1 sentence1981Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So.2d 904 (Fla. 1976) (news media have special concerns entitling them to notice and at least a summary hearing before any trial court enjoins or limits publication of court proceedings). [2] The judge apparently also ruled that sketch artists would be excluded from the courtroom, although the record is not clear that a formal ruling was made. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Alachua County v. Reddick
green
1 sentence1979A summary of the standard of judicial review of zoning decisions is set out *315 in the recent case of Alachua County v. Reddick, 368 So.2d 653 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979): We previously have affirmed the judiciary's responsibility to ascertain the rationality of zoning classifications. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.