Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lambert v. Stategreen2 sentences2020See Lambert v. State, 302 Ga. App. 573, 577 (4) ( 692 SE2d 15 ) (2010) (to demonstrate an impaired defense, the defendant must present more than vague or conclusory statements). 2020See Lambert v. State, 302 Ga. App. 573, 577 (4) ( 692 SE2d 15 ) (2010) (to demonstrate an impaired defense, the defendant must present more than vague or conclusory statements). | 3 | 3 |
Higgins v. Stategreen2 sentences2020Durham asserts only “inherent prejudice which accompanies any long delay.” He does not point to any actual or specific prejudice to his defense, arguing only that the length of the delay “teeter[s] on the possibility of impairing the defense.” See Higgins v. State, 308 Ga. App. 257, 263 (2) (d) ( 707 SE2d 523 ) (2011) (“To demonstrate an impaired defense, a defendant must present more than vague or conclusory statements; he must offer specific evidence.”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 2020Durham asserts only “inherent prejudice which accompanies any long delay.” He does not point to any actual or specific prejudice to his defense, arguing only that the length of the delay “teeter[s] on the possibility of impairing the defense.” See Higgins v. State, 308 Ga. App. 257, 263 (2) (d) ( 707 SE2d 523 ) (2011) (“To demonstrate an impaired defense, a defendant must present more than vague or conclusory statements; he must offer specific evidence.”) (citation and punctuation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Simmons v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Merely asserting that memories have faded over time does not satisfy this *578 requirement.” (Citations omitted.) Simmons v. State, 290 Ga. App. 315, 317 (4) ( 659 SE2d 721 ) (2008). 2010Merely asserting that memories have faded over time does not satisfy this *578 requirement.” (Citations omitted.) Simmons v. State, 290 Ga. App. 315, 317 (4) ( 659 SE2d 721 ) (2008). | 1 | 1 |
Boseman v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See id.; Boseman, supra, 263 Ga. at 734 (2). 2006See id.; Boseman, supra, 263 Ga. at 734 (2). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Frazier v. State
green
1 sentence2008Frazier, supra, 277 Ga. App. at 883 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.