person claiming privilege in Georgia

2014Moreover, and of primary importance in this case, is the fact that unlike other recognized privileges, the psychiatrist-patient privilege survives the death of the patient.6 See Sims v. State, 251 Ga. 877, 881 ( 311 SE2d 161 ) (1984); 5 Applying these rules, our courts have determined that the privilege is not waived when a party claiming the privilege puts at issue in a civil proceeding the nature and extent of his or her emotional or mental injuries, see Mincey v. Georgia Dept. of Community Affairs, 308 Ga. App. 740, 745 ( 708 SE2d 644 ) (2011), is not waived when the person claiming the pri

2014Moreover, and of primary importance in this case, is the fact that unlike other recognized privileges, the psychiatrist-patient privilege survives the death of the patient.6 See Sims v. State, 251 Ga. 877, 881 ( 311 SE2d 161 ) (1984); 5 Applying these rules, our courts have determined that the privilege is not waived when a party claiming the privilege puts at issue in a civil proceeding the nature and extent of his or her emotional or mental injuries, see Mincey v. Georgia Dept. of Community Affairs, 308 Ga. App. 740, 745 ( 708 SE2d 644 ) (2011), is not waived when the person claiming the pri

2014See Kennestone Hosp., Inc., supra, 273 Ga. at 149 (“Given the importance of the privilege in encouraging and protecting confidential communications concerning the emotional and mental health of individuals, . . . the silence and failure to act in response to a request for privileged matter . . . does not waive the party’s privilege by implication.”).

2014See Kennestone Hosp., Inc., supra, 273 Ga. at 149 (“Given the importance of the privilege in encouraging and protecting confidential communications concerning the emotional and mental health of individuals, . . . [the] silence and failure to act in response to a request for privileged matter ... does not waive the party’s privilege by implication.”).

2014Moreover, and of primary importance in this case, is the fact that unlike other recognized privileges, the psychiatrist-patient privilege survives the death of the patient.6 See Sims v. State, 251 Ga. 877, 881 ( 311 SE2d 161 ) (1984); 5 Applying these rules, our courts have determined that the privilege is not waived when a party claiming the privilege puts at issue in a civil proceeding the nature and extent of his or her emotional or mental injuries, see Mincey v. Georgia Dept. of Community Affairs, 308 Ga. App. 740, 745 ( 708 SE2d 644 ) (2011), is not waived when the person claiming the pri

2014Moreover, and of primary importance in this case, is the fact that unlike other recognized privileges, the psychiatrist-patient privilege survives the death of the patient.6 See Sims v. State, 251 Ga. 877, 881 ( 311 SE2d 161 ) (1984); 5 Applying these rules, our courts have determined that the privilege is not waived when a party claiming the privilege puts at issue in a civil proceeding the nature and extent of his or her emotional or mental injuries, see Mincey v. Georgia Dept. of Community Affairs, 308 Ga. App. 740, 745 ( 708 SE2d 644 ) (2011), is not waived when the person claiming the pri

2014Moreover, and of primary importance in this case, is the fact that unlike other recognized privileges, the psychiatrist-patient privilege survives the death of the patient.6 See Sims v. State, 251 Ga. 877, 881 ( 311 SE2d 161 ) (1984); 5 Applying these rules, our courts have determined that the privilege is not waived when a party claiming the privilege puts at issue in a civil proceeding the nature and extent of his or her emotional or mental injuries, see Mincey v. Georgia Dept. of Community Affairs, 308 Ga. App. 740, 745 ( 708 SE2d 644 ) (2011), is not waived when the person claiming the pri

2014Moreover, and of primary importance in this case, is the fact that unlike other recognized privileges, the psychiatrist-patient privilege survives the death of the patient.6 See Sims v. State, 251 Ga. 877, 881 ( 311 SE2d 161 ) (1984); 5 Applying these rules, our courts have determined that the privilege is not waived when a party claiming the privilege puts at issue in a civil proceeding the nature and extent of his or her emotional or mental injuries, see Mincey v. Georgia Dept. of Community Affairs, 308 Ga. App. 740, 745 ( 708 SE2d 644 ) (2011), is not waived when the person claiming the pri

2010It protected “papers and effects ... [that were] the personal property of the person claiming the privilege, or at least in his possession in a purely personal capacity.” Id.

1981United States v. White, 322 U. S. 694, 698-699 (64 SC 1248, 88 LE 1542).

2023(Emphasis supplied.) Copeland, 310 Ga. at 350 (2) (a). 8 Thus, in considering Larscheid’s motion for immunity, the trial court was required to consider whether McCrary’s conduct constituted an imminent use of unlawful force and whether Larscheid’s use of the ASP baton against McCrary was based on a reasonable belief that this force was necessary to defend himself or a third person against McCrary’s imminent use of unlawful force.

2019The person claiming a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights bears the burden of demonstrating that he has “standing to contest such violation, i. e., that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the premises searched.” (Citation omitted.) Atwater v. State, 233 Ga. App. 339, 340 (2) ( 503 SE2d 919 ) (1998).

2019The person claiming a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights bears the burden of demonstrating that he has “standing to contest such violation, i. e., that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the premises searched.” (Citation omitted.) Atwater v. State, 233 Ga. App. 339, 340 (2) ( 503 SE2d 919 ) (1998).

1935Holmes v. Clisby, 118 Ga. 820, 825 ( 45 S. E. 684 ).