16 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Waffle House, Inc. v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2025Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams, 313 S.W.3d 796, 804 (Tex. 2010); Chatha, 381 S.W.3d at 513–14 (same). 2024Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams, 313 S.W.3d 796, 804 (Tex. 2010); Lopez, 368 S.W.3d at 701 (“The exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to file suit for unlawful employment practices.”) (citing Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranville, 933 S.W.2d 490, 492 (Tex. 1996); Santi, 312 S.W.3d at 804 (“Failure to timely file an administrative complaint deprives Texas trial courts of subject-matter jurisdiction”))). | 5 | 5 |
Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranvillegreen2 sentences2024Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams, 313 S.W.3d 796, 804 (Tex. 2010); Lopez, 368 S.W.3d at 701 (“The exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to file suit for unlawful employment practices.”) (citing Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranville, 933 S.W.2d 490, 492 (Tex. 1996); Santi, 312 S.W.3d at 804 (“Failure to timely file an administrative complaint deprives Texas trial courts of subject-matter jurisdiction”))). 2024Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams, 313 S.W.3d 796, 804 (Tex. 2010); Lopez v. Tex. State Univ., 368 S.W.3d 695, 701 (Tex. App.—Austin 2012, pet. denied) (“The exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to filing suit for unlawful employment practices.” (citing Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranville, 933 S.W.2d 490, 492 (Tex. 1996))); Santi v. Univ. of Tex. Health Sci. | 3 | 3 |
Sonya Thorn Lopez v. Texas State University, Sherri H. Benn, and Stella Silvagreen2 sentences2024Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams, 313 S.W.3d 796, 804 (Tex. 2010); Lopez, 368 S.W.3d at 701 (“The exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to file suit for unlawful employment practices.”) (citing Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranville, 933 S.W.2d 490, 492 (Tex. 1996); Santi, 312 S.W.3d at 804 (“Failure to timely file an administrative complaint deprives Texas trial courts of subject-matter jurisdiction”))). 2024Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams, 313 S.W.3d 796, 804 (Tex. 2010); Lopez v. Tex. State Univ., 368 S.W.3d 695, 701 (Tex. App.—Austin 2012, pet. denied) (“The exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to filing suit for unlawful employment practices.” (citing Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranville, 933 S.W.2d 490, 492 (Tex. 1996))); Santi v. Univ. of Tex. Health Sci. | 3 | 3 |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cancholagreen2 sentences2016Smith v. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center of Dallas, 101 S.W.3d 185, 188 (Tex.App.—Dallas 2003, no pet.); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola, 64 S.W.3d 524, 533 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 2001, pet. granted). 2003Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola, 64 S.W.3d 524, 533 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2001, no pet.). | 3 | 3 |
Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.red2 sentences2005In Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc., we held that a person claiming a violation of the Commission on Human Rights Act (CHRA) must first exhaust the administrative remedies set out in the statute. 813 S.W.2d 483, 485 (Tex.1991) (citing Act of July 8, 1983, 68th Leg., 1st C.S., ch. 7, 1983 Tex. Gen. 2005In Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc., we held that a person claiming a violation of the Commission on Human Rights Act (CHRA) must first exhaust the administrative remedies set out in the statute. 813 S.W.2d 483, 485 (Tex. 1991) (citing Act of July 8, 1983, 68th Leg., 1st C.S., ch. 7, 1983 Tex. Gen. | 3 | 3 |
Williams-Pyro, Inc. v. Rhonda Barbourgreen2 sentences2025Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams, 313 S.W.3d 11 796, 804 (Tex. 2010); Williams-Pyro, Inc. v. Barbour, 408 S.W.3d 467, 475 (Tex.App.—El Paso 2013, pet denied). 2018Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams, 313 S.W.3d 796, 804 (Tex. 2010); Williams-Pyro, Inc. v. Barbour, 408 S.W.3d 467, 475 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2013, pet denied). | 2 | 2 |
Welch v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Welch v. State, 908 S.W.2d 258, 264-65 (Tex. App.— El Paso 1995, no pet.). 2008Welch v. State , 908 S.W.2d 258, 264-65 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1995, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
John Hinkley v. Envoy Air, Incorporatedgreen1 sentence2024See, e.g., Hinkley v. Envoy Air, Inc., 968 F.3d 544, 552 (5th Cir. 2020) (TCHRA “requires those claiming employment discrimination to file an administrative complaint with the TWC before filing an action in court”) (citing TEX. | 1 | 1 |
Santi v. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houstongreen1 sentence2024Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams, 313 S.W.3d 796, 804 (Tex. 2010); Lopez, 368 S.W.3d at 701 (“The exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to file suit for unlawful employment practices.”) (citing Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranville, 933 S.W.2d 490, 492 (Tex. 1996); Santi, 312 S.W.3d at 804 (“Failure to timely file an administrative complaint deprives Texas trial courts of subject-matter jurisdiction”))). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. UNIV. TEX. SOUTHWESTERN MED. CTR.green1 sentence2016Smith v. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center of Dallas, 101 S.W.3d 185, 188 (Tex.App.—Dallas 2003, no pet.); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola, 64 S.W.3d 524, 533 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 2001, pet. granted). | 1 | 1 |
Downing v. Browngreen1 sentence2000Downing v. Brown, 925 S.W.2d 316, 320 (Tex.App.— Amarillo 1996, rev’d on other grounds, 935 S.W.2d 112 (Tex.1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Prairie View A&M University v. Diljit K. Chatha
green
1 sentence2025Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams, 313 S.W.3d 796, 804 (Tex. 2010); Chatha, 381 S.W.3d at 513–14 (same). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Downing v. Brown
green
1 sentence2000Downing v. Brown, 925 S.W.2d 316, 320 (Tex.App.— Amarillo 1996, rev’d on other grounds, 935 S.W.2d 112 (Tex.1996). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.