Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Grizzle v. Stategreen2 sentences2014(Citation, punctuation and footnote omitted.) Grizzle v. State, 310 Ga. App. 577, 580 (2) ( 713 SE2d 701 ) (2011). “[IJnventories conducted by the police pursuant to standard police procedures are deemed to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Id. at 579 (1). 2014(Citation, punctuation and footnote omitted.) Grizzle v. State, 310 Ga. App. 577, 580 (2) ( 713 SE2d 701 ) (2011). “[IJnventories conducted by the police pursuant to standard police procedures are deemed to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Id. at 579 (1). | 4 | 4 |
Davis v. the Stategreen2 sentences2025Moreover, “inventories conducted by the police pursuant to standard police procedures are deemed to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” Davis v. State, 331 Ga. App. 171, 174 ( 769 SE2d 183 ) (2015) (citation and punctuation omitted). 2025Moreover, “inventories conducted by the police pursuant to standard police procedures are deemed to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” Davis v. State, 331 Ga. App. 171, 174 ( 769 SE2d 183 ) (2015) (citation and punctuation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Colorado v. Bertinegreen2 sentences2012(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Grizzle, supra, 310 Ga. App. at 580 (2). “[Inventories conducted by the police pursuant to standard police procedures are deemed to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” (Citation, punctuation and footnote omitted.) Id.; see also Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U. S. 367, 374, n. 6 (107 SC 738, 93 LE2d 739) (1987). 2012(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Grizzle, supra, 310 Ga. App. at 580 (2). “[I]nventories conducted by the police pursuant to standard police procedures are deemed to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” (Citation, punctuation and footnote omitted.) Id.; see also Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U. S. 367 , 374 n.6 (107 SC 2 We note that our courts have held that an inventory may be conducted at the scene of arrest or at the police station. | 2 | 2 |
Carson v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See Carson v. State, 241 Ga. 622, 623 (1) ( 247 SE2d 68 ) (1978). 6 738, 93 LE2d 739) (1987). 2012See Carson v. State, 241 Ga. 622, 623 (1) ( 247 SE2d 68 ) (1978). 6 738, 93 LE2d 739) (1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Capellan v. State
green
1 sentence2025“Inventories conducted by the police pursuant to standard police procedures are deemed to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Capellan, 316 Ga. App. at 470 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Clay v. State
green
2 sentences2012In Clay v. State, 290 Ga. 822 ( 725 SE2d 260 ) (2012), the Supreme Court of Georgia noted “that the inventory of containers must be in accordance with established inventory procedures.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. at 830 (2) (A). 2012In Clay v. State, 290 Ga. 822 ( 725 SE2d 260 ) (2012), the Supreme Court of Georgia noted “that the inventory of containers must be in accordance with established inventory procedures.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. at 830 (2) (A). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.