Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Waters v. Stategreen2 sentences2018"Interrogation for the purposes of Miranda warnings encompasses express questioning and words and actions that officers should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the subject." Waters v. State , 281 Ga. 119 , 122, 636 S.E.2d 538 (2006). 2018"Interrogation for the purposes of Miranda warnings encompasses express questioning and words and actions that officers should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the subject." Waters v. State , 281 Ga. 119 , 122, 636 S.E.2d 538 (2006). | 3 | 4 |
Logan v. Stategreen2 sentences2012Furthermore, “[t]he determination of whether an interrogation occurs focuses primarily upon the reasonable perceptions of the suspect and not the intent of the officer, although the officer’s intent is relevant.” (Footnote omitted.) Logan v. State, 309 Ga. App. 95, 101 (3) ( 709 SE2d 302 ) (2011). 2012Furthermore, “[t]he determination of whether an interrogation occurs focuses primarily upon the reasonable perceptions of the suspect and not the intent of the officer, although the officer’s intent is relevant.” (Footnote omitted.) Logan v. State, 309 Ga. App. 95, 101 (3) ( 709 SE2d 302 ) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
Tune v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See Tune v. State, 286 Ga. App. 32, 35 (1) (b) ( 648 SE2d 423 ) (2007) (finding that a temporary detention under similar circumstances did not constitute an arrest for the purposes of Miranda warnings); Harper v. State, 243 Ga. App. at 706 (1) (noting that “not every detention is an arrest”) (citation omitted). 2008See Tune v. State, 286 Ga. App. 32, 35 (1) (b) ( 648 SE2d 423 ) (2007) (finding that a temporary detention under similar circumstances did not constitute an arrest for the purposes of Miranda warnings); Harper v. State, 243 Ga. App. at 706 (1) (noting that “not every detention is an arrest”) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Harper v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See Tune v. State, 286 Ga. App. 32, 35 (1) (b) ( 648 SE2d 423 ) (2007) (finding that a temporary detention under similar circumstances did not constitute an arrest for the purposes of Miranda warnings); Harper v. State, 243 Ga. App. at 706 (1) (noting that “not every detention is an arrest”) (citation omitted). 2008We conclude that, under the circumstances presented, “a reasonable person could conclude that his freedom of action was only temporarily curtailed and that a final determination of his status was simply delayed.” Harper v. State, 243 Ga. App. at 706 (1). | 1 | 1 |
Rhode Island v. Innisgreen1 sentence2006Lucas v. State, 273 Ga. 88 (2) ( 538 SE2d 44 ) (2000); Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U. S. 291, 300-302 (100 SC 1682, 64 LE2d 297) (1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hardin v. State
green
2 sentences2009Hardin v. State, 269 Ga. 1 (2) ( 494 SE2d 647 ) (1998). 2009Hardin v. State, 269 Ga. 1 (2) ( 494 SE2d 647 ) (1998). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Lucas v. State
green
2 sentences2006Lucas v. State, 273 Ga. 88 (2) ( 538 SE2d 44 ) (2000); Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U. S. 291, 300-302 (100 SC 1682, 64 LE2d 297) (1980). 2006Lucas v. State, 273 Ga. 88 (2) ( 538 SE2d 44 ) (2000); Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U. S. 291, 300-302 (100 SC 1682, 64 LE2d 297) (1980). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.