Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Atlanta Humane Society v. Harkinsgreen2 sentences2021See Atlanta Humane Society v. Harkins, 278 Ga. 451, 456 (2) ( 603 SE2d 289 ) (2004). 3 2021See Atlanta Humane Society v. Harkins, 278 Ga. 451, 456 (2) ( 603 SE2d 289 ) (2004). 3 | 1 | 1 |
Almond v. McCraniegreen2 sentences2013Viewed in favor of the verdict,1 the evidence shows that in May 2011, Kemp filed a medical malpractice complaint alleging negligence claims related to the death of her husband after admission to WellStar Douglas Hospital for a broken foot and exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; attached thereto was the required expert affidavit of Dr. William Stinnette.2 Upon receiving a copy of the complaint, 1 See Almond v. McCranie, 283 Ga. App. 887, 888 ( 643 SE2d 535 ) (2007). 2 Kemp later filed Stinnette’s first amended affidavit in response to WellStar’s motion to dismiss. 2 Green, who ha 2013Viewed in favor of the verdict,1 the evidence shows that in May 2011, Kemp filed a medical malpractice complaint alleging negligence claims related to the death of her husband after admission to WellStar Douglas Hospital for a broken foot and exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; attached thereto was the required expert affidavit of Dr. William Stinnette.2 Upon receiving a copy of the complaint, 1 See Almond v. McCranie, 283 Ga. App. 887, 888 ( 643 SE2d 535 ) (2007). 2 Kemp later filed Stinnette’s first amended affidavit in response to WellStar’s motion to dismiss. 2 Green, who ha | 1 | 1 |
Pew v. One Buckhead Loop Condominium Ass'ngreen2 sentences2012Ass’n, Inc., 305 Ga. App. 456, 456 ( 700 SE2d 831 ) (2010); see also OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). 2 See, e.g., Pew, 305 Ga. App. at 456 . 3 The liens stated that Wellstar claim[ed] a lien on all sums and amounts, whether in property or money, paid to the above named patient or their legal representative by any person, firm or corporation ..., if any, as a settlement, as a release, or as a judgment or as consideration for a covenant not to sue when said sum or amounts represent damages or compensation for the patient’s injuries for which [Wellstar] has rendered its services to such injuries. 4 280 Ga. 57 2012Ass’n, Inc., 305 Ga. App. 456, 456 ( 700 SE2d 831 ) (2010); see also OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). 2 See, e.g., Pew, 305 Ga. App. at 456 . 3 The liens stated that Wellstar claim[ed] a lien on all sums and amounts, whether in property or money, paid to the above named patient or their legal representative by any person, firm or corporation ..., if any, as a settlement, as a release, or as a judgment or as consideration for a covenant not to sue when said sum or amounts represent damages or compensation for the patient’s injuries for which [Wellstar] has rendered its services to such injuries. 4 280 Ga. 57 | 1 | 1 |
Frickey v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2012Ass’n, Inc., 305 Ga. App. 456, 456 ( 700 SE2d 831 ) (2010); see also OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). 2 See, e.g., Pew, 305 Ga. App. at 456 . 3 The liens stated that Wellstar claim[ed] a lien on all sums and amounts, whether in property or money, paid to the above named patient or their legal representative by any person, firm or corporation ..., if any, as a settlement, as a release, or as a judgment or as consideration for a covenant not to sue when said sum or amounts represent damages or compensation for the patient’s injuries for which [Wellstar] has rendered its services to such injuries. 4 280 Ga. 57 2012Ass’n, Inc., 305 Ga. App. 456, 456 ( 700 SE2d 831 ) (2010); see also OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). 2 See, e.g., Pew, 305 Ga. App. at 456 . 3 The liens stated that Wellstar claim[ed] a lien on all sums and amounts, whether in property or money, paid to the above named patient or their legal representative by any person, firm or corporation ..., if any, as a settlement, as a release, or as a judgment or as consideration for a covenant not to sue when said sum or amounts represent damages or compensation for the patient’s injuries for which [Wellstar] has rendered its services to such injuries. 4 280 Ga. 57 | 1 | 1 |
Southern General Insurance v. Holtgreen2 sentences2012Ass’n, Inc., 305 Ga. App. 456, 456 ( 700 SE2d 831 ) (2010); see also OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). 2 See, e.g., Pew, 305 Ga. App. at 456 . 3 The liens stated that Wellstar claim[ed] a lien on all sums and amounts, whether in property or money, paid to the above named patient or their legal representative by any person, firm or corporation ..., if any, as a settlement, as a release, or as a judgment or as consideration for a covenant not to sue when said sum or amounts represent damages or compensation for the patient’s injuries for which [Wellstar] has rendered its services to such injuries. 4 280 Ga. 57 2012Ass’n, Inc., 305 Ga. App. 456, 456 ( 700 SE2d 831 ) (2010); see also OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). 2 See, e.g., Pew, 305 Ga. App. at 456 . 3 The liens stated that Wellstar claim[ed] a lien on all sums and amounts, whether in property or money, paid to the above named patient or their legal representative by any person, firm or corporation ..., if any, as a settlement, as a release, or as a judgment or as consideration for a covenant not to sue when said sum or amounts represent damages or compensation for the patient’s injuries for which [Wellstar] has rendered its services to such injuries. 4 280 Ga. 57 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Moreland v. Austin
green
2 sentences2010After oral argument, the trial court granted Wellstar’s motion, finding, under the authority of Moreland v. Austin, 284 Ga. 730 ( 670 SE2d 68 ) (2008), that HIPAA allows such ex parte interviews as long as specified procedural safeguards are utilized to protect patient privacy. 2010After oral argument, the trial court granted Wellstar’s motion, finding, under the authority of Moreland v. Austin, 284 Ga. 730 ( 670 SE2d 68 ) (2008), that HIPAA allows such ex parte interviews as long as specified procedural safeguards are utilized to protect patient privacy. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Ford Motor Co. v. Young
green
2 sentences2013Although the trial court granted a certificate of immediate review, neither the Lawyers nor WellStar applied to this Court for interlocutory appeal. 322 Ga. App. 348 ( 745 SE2d 299 ) (2013). 2013Although the trial court granted a certificate of immediate review, neither the Lawyers nor WellStar applied to this Court for interlocutory appeal. 322 Ga. App. 348 ( 745 SE2d 299 ) (2013). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
In Re LHR
green
2 sentences2008This Court held that a plaintiff may not "premise a claim for medical battery on the assertion that he did not consent to the negligent performance of the medical procedure otherwise covered by a valid consent, because such a role would transform every medical malpractice claim into a battery claim." (Punctuation omitted.) Id. (b) Withdrawal of life support was not rendered improper based on the employment status of the two physicians who participated with Dr. Jose in that decision. *891 Plaintiffs, also contend that the decision to withdraw Ella's life support amounted to an intentional tort 2008This Court held that a plaintiff may not "premise a claim for medical battery on the assertion that he did not consent to the negligent performance of the medical procedure otherwise covered by a valid consent, because such a role would transform every medical malpractice claim into a battery claim." (Punctuation omitted.) Id. (b) Withdrawal of life support was not rendered improper based on the employment status of the two physicians who participated with Dr. Jose in that decision. *891 Plaintiffs, also contend that the decision to withdraw Ella's life support amounted to an intentional tort | 1 | 2008–2008 |
In Re Jane Doe
green
1 sentence2008This Court held that a plaintiff may not "premise a claim for medical battery on the assertion that he did not consent to the negligent performance of the medical procedure otherwise covered by a valid consent, because such a role would transform every medical malpractice claim into a battery claim." (Punctuation omitted.) Id. (b) Withdrawal of life support was not rendered improper based on the employment status of the two physicians who participated with Dr. Jose in that decision. *891 Plaintiffs, also contend that the decision to withdraw Ella's life support amounted to an intentional tort | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.