exhaustion of administrative remedies doctrine (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

exhaustion of administrative remedies doctrine in Iowa

7 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Charles Gabus Ford, Inc. v. Iowa State Highway Commissiongreen
iowa · 1974 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1979–1996
2 sentences

1996We have stated that the exhaustion of administrative remedies doctrine does not apply if, by the terms and implications of the statutes authorizing an administrative remedy, “such remedy is permissive only or not exclusive of the judicial remedy, warranting the conclusion that the legislature intended to permit resort to the courts even though the administrative remedy has not been exhausted.” Charles Gabus Ford, Inc. v. Iowa State Highway Comm’n, 224 N.W.2d 639, 647 (Iowa 1974).

1979See Charles Gabus Ford v. Iowa State Highway Comm’n, 224 N.W.2d at 648 .

22
Salsbury Laboratories v. Iowa Department of Environmental Qualitygreen
iowa · 1979 · cited in 3 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1985–2001
2 sentences

2001Salsbury Labs., 276 N.W.2d at 836 .

1996We recognize that a “showing of irreparable injury resulting from following the administrative process would make judicial review of final agency action an inadequate remedy.” Salsbury Lab., 276 N.W.2d at 887 ; see McManus v. Iowa Dep’t of Revenue & Fin., 499 N.W.2d 726, 727 (Iowa 1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 580 , 126 L.Ed.2d 479 (1993); Iowa Indus.

13
Riley v. Boxagreen
iowa · 1996 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See id.

11
Colorado State Board of Agriculture, in Its Capacity as the Governing Board of the Colorado State University v. Robertsgreen
scotus · 1993 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
1 sentence

1996We recognize that a “showing of irreparable injury resulting from following the administrative process would make judicial review of final agency action an inadequate remedy.” Salsbury Lab., 276 N.W.2d at 887 ; see McManus v. Iowa Dep’t of Revenue & Fin., 499 N.W.2d 726, 727 (Iowa 1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 580 , 126 L.Ed.2d 479 (1993); Iowa Indus.

11
McManus v. State, Department of Revenue & Financegreen
iowa · 1993 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
1 sentence

1996We recognize that a “showing of irreparable injury resulting from following the administrative process would make judicial review of final agency action an inadequate remedy.” Salsbury Lab., 276 N.W.2d at 887 ; see McManus v. Iowa Dep’t of Revenue & Fin., 499 N.W.2d 726, 727 (Iowa 1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 580 , 126 L.Ed.2d 479 (1993); Iowa Indus.

11
Black v. University of Iowagreen
iowa · 1985 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993Black v. University of Iowa, 362 N.W.2d 459, 464 (Iowa 1985).

11
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. State Tax Commissiongreen
iowa · 1950 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1971–1971
2 sentences

1971See also Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Iowa State Tax Comm’n, 242 Iowa 33 , 44 N.W.2d 449 ; 73 C.J.S.

1971See also Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Iowa State Tax Comm’n, 242 Iowa 33 , 44 N.W.2d 449 ; 73 C.J.S.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IA § Iowa Code § 17A.19 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 235 (1941–2026) TX 89 (1973–2025) NY 79 (1958–2026) PA 78 (1969–2026) IL 71 (1963–2025) CT 48 (1983–2026) NJ 39 (1952–2025) OH 36 (1990–2025) AZ 29 (1957–2025) MD 26 (1982–2020) MI 26 (1972–2026) AL 25 (1976–2025) IN 25 (1977–2019) ME 24 (1974–2024) AR 22 (1988–2025) MO 18 (1969–2025) WI 15 (1972–2026) AK 14 (1985–2023) NM 13 (1998–2026) UT 13 (1993–2020) CO 12 (1982–2012) FL 12 (1958–2022) DC 11 (1972–2010) WA 11 (1969–2016) TN 10 (1946–2020) MS 10 (1966–2021) MA 10 (1979–2014) DE 10 (1992–2025) SC 10 (1977–2023) MN 10 (1957–2007) KS 9 (1986–2021) NC 8 (2008–2020) RI 7 (1966–2017) WV 7 (1966–2026) IA 7 (1971–2016) NH 6 (1998–2018) HI 6 (2012–2025) GA 5 (1986–2017) WY 4 (1982–2020) OK 4 (1980–2005) VT 3 (1952–2001) ID 3 (1990–2023) SD 3 (1975–1987) LA 3 (1976–2024) NV 3 (1979–2021) NE 2 (1998–2017) OR 2 (1997–2019) ND 2 (2014–2024) VA 2 (2000–2010) MT 2 (2022–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check