25 Indiana opinions name it 3 courts 1977–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Ispat Inland, Inc.green2 sentences2015See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. Ispat Inland, Inc., 784 N.E.2d 477, 482 (Ind.2003). 2015See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. Ispat Inland, Inc., 784 N.E.2d 477, 482 (Ind. 2003). | 12 | 12 |
Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. Twin Eagle LLCgreen2 sentences2015Mgmt. v. Twin Eagle LLC, 798 N.E.2d 839, 844 (Ind.2003) (citation omitted). *837 ANALYSIS I. 2015Mgmt. v. Twin Eagle LLC, 798 N.E.2d 839, 844 (Ind. 2003) (citation omitted). | 11 | 11 |
Yorktown Homes South, Inc. v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessorgreen2 sentences2018Id. 2015See Ind.Code §§ 33-26-3-1(1), -3 (2015); Grandville, 25 N.E.3d at 836 (explaining that the final determination requirement includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement). | 1 | 2 |
Trinity Marine Products, Inc. v. Chaogreen1 sentence2012The Seventh Circuit therefore “join[ed] the other circuits that require parties challenging completed OSHA inspections on fourth amendment grounds to address their arguments to the Review Commission before turning to the federal courts.” 3 Id. at 814 ; see also Trinity Marine Products, Inc. v. Chao, 512 F.3d 198, 203 (5th Cir.2007) (“Administrative warrants also differ from traditional criminal warrants in that the exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies doctrine applies, meaning that an employer who wishes to challenge a warrant cannot immediately file a motion in district court to suppress the | 1 | 1 |
Town Board of Orland v. Greenfield Mills, Inc.green1 sentence2012In support of his argument, Ogden points to Town Bd. of Orland v. Greenfield Mills, Inc., 663 N.E.2d 523, 525 (Ind.1996), in which the supreme court stated that "[i]f all of the issues or claims are clearly matters for exclusive administrative or regulatory agency determination, the court is without subject matter jurisdiction and must dismiss the complaint. | 1 | 1 |
Zayas v. Gregg Appliances, Inc.green2 sentences2011Zayas had attempted to circumvent the exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies requirement by arguing that his case was "not an action for a tax refund, but an action for return of monies improperly collected by Gregg," id. at 367 (footnote omitted), because, from his perspective, the charge on the delivery fee had been "a mere purchase price overcharge," not an authorized sales tax, id. 2011Zayas had attempted to circumvent the exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies requirement by arguing that his case was "not an action for a tax refund, but an action for return of monies improperly collected by Gregg," id. at 367 (footnote omitted), because, from his perspective, the charge on the delivery fee had been "a mere purchase price overcharge," not an authorized sales tax, id. | 1 | 1 |
Karamo B. Kaba v. E.A. Stepp, Mickal E. Laird, Dave Benson, and Joseph Yonkmangreen1 sentence2010Woodford, 126 S.Ct. at 2392 ; Kaba v. Stepp, 458 F.3d 678, 684 (7th Cir.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Roark v. City of New Albanygreen1 sentence1985See, Roark v. City of New Albany (1984), Ind.App., 466 N.E.2d 62 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
First American Title Insurance Co. v. Robertson
green
1 sentence2019Id. ; see also, e.g. , Indianapolis-Marion Cty. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Ogden v. Robertson
green
1 sentence2016The court reasoned as follows: “If we were to hold that a claimant could seek judicial review based on a right derived from the WBL through common law and, therefore, bypass the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement of the WBL, it would make the exhaustion requirements of the WBL illusory.” Id. at 146 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
In Re Establishment Inspection of Kohler Company. Appeal of Kohler Co
green
1 sentence2012Id. 10 203 (5th Cir. 2007) (“Administrative warrants also differ from traditional criminal warrants in that the exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies doctrine applies, meaning that an employer who wishes to challenge a warrant cannot immediately file a motion in district court to suppress the evidence after the warrant has been executed.”). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Woodford v. Ngo
red
1 sentence2010Woodford, 126 S.Ct. at 2392 ; Kaba v. Stepp, 458 F.3d 678, 684 (7th Cir.2006). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Myers v. Moyars
green
1 sentence2004Myers v. Moyars, 667 N.E.2d at 1122-23 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Slay v. Marion County Sheriff's Department
green
1 sentence1996Our conclusion is bolstered by our recent statement, “[fjederal substantive law controls, and any state laws or rules which inhibit the prosecution of a § 1983 action are preempted by the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.” Slay v. Marion County Sheriffs Dept., 603 N.E.2d 877 , 884 n. 3 (Ind.Ct.App.1992), trans. denied. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Morand
neutral
2 sentences1977We need only echo the sentiments expressed in State v. Morand (1976), 169 Ind. App. 604 , 349 N.E.2d 718 , 721: “While Indiana has long followed the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies, implicit in all reported cases is the assumption that the statutory remedy is available at the time the challenged judicial relief is sought. 1977We need only echo the sentiments expressed in State v. Morand (1976), 169 Ind. App. 604 , 349 N.E.2d 718 , 721: “While Indiana has long followed the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies, implicit in all reported cases is the assumption that the statutory remedy is available at the time the challenged judicial relief is sought. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.