Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Millergreen2 sentences2017Id. at 908 (quoting Bond, 340 N.W.2d at 279 ); see Miller, 637 N.W.2d at 204 (“The trial court’s discretion to avoid dismissal under [the rule] is circumscribed by the limited exceptions to the rule’s mandate.”). 2017Id. at 908 (quoting Bond, 340 N.W.2d at 279 ); see Miller, 637 N.W.2d at 204 (“The trial court’s discretion to avoid dismissal under [the rule] is circumscribed by the limited exceptions to the rule’s mandate.”). | 3 | 5 |
State v. Bondgreen2 sentences2017Id. at 908 (quoting Bond, 340 N.W.2d at 279 ); see Miller, 637 N.W.2d at 204 (“The trial court’s discretion to avoid dismissal under [the rule] is circumscribed by the limited exceptions to the rule’s mandate.”). 2017Id. at 908 (quoting Bond, 340 N.W.2d at 279 ); see Miller, 637 N.W.2d at 204 (“The trial court’s discretion to avoid dismissal under [the rule] is circumscribed by the limited exceptions to the rule’s mandate.”). | 2 | 3 |
State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel Ramirezgreen2 sentences2017“Sufficiency of evidence claims are reviewed for correction of errors at law, and we will uphold a verdict if substantial evidence supports it.” State v. Ramirez, 895 N.W.2d 884, 890 (Iowa 2017). 2017“Sufficiency of evidence claims are reviewed for correction of errors at law, and we will uphold a verdict if substantial evidence supports it.” State v. Ramirez, 895 N.W.2d 884, 890 (Iowa 2017). | 2 | 2 |
City of Davenport v. Shewry Corp.green1 sentence2015See City of Davenport v. Shewry Corp., 674 N.W.2d 79, 86 (Iowa 2004) (stating a guaranty is a contract by one party (the Hefels) to a second party (DuTrac) for the fulfillment of a promise of a third party (Star Properties)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Olsongreen1 sentence2001State v. Bond, 340 N.W.2d 276, 279 (Iowa 1983); State v. Olson, 528 N.W.2d 651, 653 (Iowa Ct.App.1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Winters
green
2 sentences2017Id. at 908 (quoting Bond, 340 N.W.2d at 279 ); see Miller, 637 N.W.2d at 204 (“The trial court’s discretion to avoid dismissal under [the rule] is circumscribed by the limited exceptions to the rule’s mandate.”). 2017Id. at 908 (quoting Bond, 340 N.W.2d at 279 ); see Miller, 637 N.W.2d at 204 (“The trial court’s discretion to avoid dismissal under [the rule] is circumscribed by the limited exceptions to the rule’s mandate.”). | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.