Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hildrethgreen2 sentences2017See id. (stating statement must be consistent with the purposes of promoting treatment); see also Smith, 876 N.W.2d at 186 (stating “[t]he emotional and psychological injuries of such abuse are treated by the doctor along with the physical injury” (citing Tracy, 482 N.W.2d at 681 )); State v. Hildreth, 582 N.W.2d 167, 170 (Iowa 1998) (“[W]here a child’s statements are made during a dialogue with a health care professional and are not prompted by concerns extraneous to the patient’s physical or emotional problem, real or perceived, the first prong of the Renville test is satisfied.”); State v. 2017See id. (stating statement must be consistent with the purposes of promoting treatment); see also Smith, 876 N.W.2d at 186 (stating “[t]he emotional and psychological injuries of such abuse are treated by the doctor along with the physical injury” (citing Tracy, 482 N.W.2d at 681 )); State v. Hildreth, 582 N.W.2d 167, 170 (Iowa 1998) (“[W]here a child’s statements are made during a dialogue with a health care professional and are not prompted by concerns extraneous to the patient’s physical or emotional problem, real or perceived, the first prong of the Renville test is satisfied.”); State v. | 2 | 6 |
State v. Tracygreen2 sentences2017See id. (stating statement must be consistent with the purposes of promoting treatment); see also Smith, 876 N.W.2d at 186 (stating “[t]he emotional and psychological injuries of such abuse are treated by the doctor along with the physical injury” (citing Tracy, 482 N.W.2d at 681 )); State v. Hildreth, 582 N.W.2d 167, 170 (Iowa 1998) (“[W]here a child’s statements are made during a dialogue with a health care professional and are not prompted by concerns extraneous to the patient’s physical or emotional problem, real or perceived, the first prong of the Renville test is satisfied.”); State v. 2017See id. (stating statement must be consistent with the purposes of promoting treatment); see also Smith, 876 N.W.2d at 186 (stating “[t]he emotional and psychological injuries of such abuse are treated by the doctor along with the physical injury” (citing Tracy, 482 N.W.2d at 681 )); State v. Hildreth, 582 N.W.2d 167, 170 (Iowa 1998) (“[W]here a child’s statements are made during a dialogue with a health care professional and are not prompted by concerns extraneous to the patient’s physical or emotional problem, real or perceived, the first prong of the Renville test is satisfied.”); State v. | 2 | 3 |
United States v. Harvey M. Renvillegreen2 sentences2017See id. (stating statement must be consistent with the purposes of promoting treatment); see also Smith, 876 N.W.2d at 186 (stating “[t]he emotional and psychological injuries of such abuse are treated by the doctor along with the physical injury” (citing Tracy, 482 N.W.2d at 681 )); State v. Hildreth, 582 N.W.2d 167, 170 (Iowa 1998) (“[W]here a child’s statements are made during a dialogue with a health care professional and are not prompted by concerns extraneous to the patient’s physical or emotional problem, real or perceived, the first prong of the Renville test is satisfied.”); State v. 2017See id. (stating statement must be consistent with the purposes of promoting treatment); see also Smith, 876 N.W.2d at 186 (stating “[t]he emotional and psychological injuries of such abuse are treated by the doctor along with the physical injury” (citing Tracy, 482 N.W.2d at 681 )); State v. Hildreth, 582 N.W.2d 167, 170 (Iowa 1998) (“[W]here a child’s statements are made during a dialogue with a health care professional and are not prompted by concerns extraneous to the patient’s physical or emotional problem, real or perceived, the first prong of the Renville test is satisfied.”); State v. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Overstreetgreen2 sentences2017See id. (stating statement must be consistent with the purposes of promoting treatment); see also Smith, 876 N.W.2d at 186 (stating “[t]he emotional and psychological injuries of such abuse are treated by the doctor along with the physical injury” (citing Tracy, 482 N.W.2d at 681 )); State v. Hildreth, 582 N.W.2d 167, 170 (Iowa 1998) (“[W]here a child’s statements are made during a dialogue with a health care professional and are not prompted by concerns extraneous to the patient’s physical or emotional problem, real or perceived, the first prong of the Renville test is satisfied.”); State v. 2017See id. (stating statement must be consistent with the purposes of promoting treatment); see also Smith, 876 N.W.2d at 186 (stating “[t]he emotional and psychological injuries of such abuse are treated by the doctor along with the physical injury” (citing Tracy, 482 N.W.2d at 681 )); State v. Hildreth, 582 N.W.2d 167, 170 (Iowa 1998) (“[W]here a child’s statements are made during a dialogue with a health care professional and are not prompted by concerns extraneous to the patient’s physical or emotional problem, real or perceived, the first prong of the Renville test is satisfied.”); State v. | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Trent D. Smithgreen2 sentences2017See id. (stating statement must be consistent with the purposes of promoting treatment); see also Smith, 876 N.W.2d at 186 (stating “[t]he emotional and psychological injuries of such abuse are treated by the doctor along with the physical injury” (citing Tracy, 482 N.W.2d at 681 )); State v. Hildreth, 582 N.W.2d 167, 170 (Iowa 1998) (“[W]here a child’s statements are made during a dialogue with a health care professional and are not prompted by concerns extraneous to the patient’s physical or emotional problem, real or perceived, the first prong of the Renville test is satisfied.”); State v. 2017See id. (stating statement must be consistent with the purposes of promoting treatment); see also Smith, 876 N.W.2d at 186 (stating “[t]he emotional and psychological injuries of such abuse are treated by the doctor along with the physical injury” (citing Tracy, 482 N.W.2d at 681 )); State v. Hildreth, 582 N.W.2d 167, 170 (Iowa 1998) (“[W]here a child’s statements are made during a dialogue with a health care professional and are not prompted by concerns extraneous to the patient’s physical or emotional problem, real or perceived, the first prong of the Renville test is satisfied.”); State v. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Terrance Kenneth Provostgreen2 sentences1992Id. at 436 ; see also United States v. Provost, 875 F.2d 172, 177 (8th Cir.1989) (affirming the Renville analysis), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 859 , 110 S.Ct. 170 , 107 L.Ed.2d 127 . 1992Id. at 436 ; see also United States v. Provost, 875 F.2d 172, 177 (8th Cir.1989) (affirming the Renville analysis), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 859 , 110 S.Ct. 170 , 107 L.Ed.2d 127 . | 1 | 1 |
Jarrett v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1992Id. at 436 ; see also United States v. Provost, 875 F.2d 172, 177 (8th Cir.1989) (affirming the Renville analysis), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 859 , 110 S.Ct. 170 , 107 L.Ed.2d 127 . 1992Id. at 436 ; see also United States v. Provost, 875 F.2d 172, 177 (8th Cir.1989) (affirming the Renville analysis), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 859 , 110 S.Ct. 170 , 107 L.Ed.2d 127 . | 1 | 1 |
Harris v. Marylandgreen2 sentences1992Id. at 436 ; see also United States v. Provost, 875 F.2d 172, 177 (8th Cir.1989) (affirming the Renville analysis), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 859 , 110 S.Ct. 170 , 107 L.Ed.2d 127 . 1992Id. at 436 ; see also United States v. Provost, 875 F.2d 172, 177 (8th Cir.1989) (affirming the Renville analysis), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 859 , 110 S.Ct. 170 , 107 L.Ed.2d 127 . | 1 | 1 |
Hopkins v. Kentucky Parole Boardgreen2 sentences1992Id. at 436 ; see also United States v. Provost, 875 F.2d 172, 177 (8th Cir.1989) (affirming the Renville analysis), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 859 , 110 S.Ct. 170 , 107 L.Ed.2d 127 . 1992Id. at 436 ; see also United States v. Provost, 875 F.2d 172, 177 (8th Cir.1989) (affirming the Renville analysis), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 859 , 110 S.Ct. 170 , 107 L.Ed.2d 127 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.