Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stahl v. Stahlgreen2 sentences2022“The commingling doctrine is a special application of the general presumption that all property acquired during marriage is community property.” Houska, 95 Idaho at 570 , 512 P.2d at 1319 (citing Stahl v. Stahl, 91 Idaho 794, 797 , 430 P.2d 685, 687 (1967)). 2022“The commingling doctrine is a special application of the general presumption that all property acquired during marriage is community property.” Houska, 95 Idaho at 570 , 512 P.2d at 1319 (citing Stahl v. Stahl, 91 Idaho 794, 797 , 430 P.2d 685, 687 (1967)). | 1 | 1 |
A v. Idaho State Bargreen2 sentences2001This Court held that Defendant A “clearly should have been aware that some extra money had come into his personal checking account, which should have caused him to make further inquiry.” Defendant A, 134 Idaho at 337, 2 P.3d at 146 . 2001This Court held that Defendant A “clearly should have been aware that some extra money had come into his personal checking account, which should have caused him to make further inquiry.” Defendant A, 134 Idaho at 337, 2 P.3d at 146 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Houska v. Houska
green
2 sentences2022“The commingling doctrine is a special application of the general presumption that all property acquired during marriage is community property.” Houska, 95 Idaho at 570 , 512 P.2d at 1319 (citing Stahl v. Stahl, 91 Idaho 794, 797 , 430 P.2d 685, 687 (1967)). 2022“The commingling doctrine is a special application of the general presumption that all property acquired during marriage is community property.” Houska, 95 Idaho at 570 , 512 P.2d at 1319 (citing Stahl v. Stahl, 91 Idaho 794, 797 , 430 P.2d 685, 687 (1967)). | 6 | 1989–2022 |
Papin v. Papin
green
2 sentences2022That said, “[c]ommingling of separate and community property does not convert the separate property to community property where the separate property can be identified through either direct tracing or accounting.” Papin, 166 Idaho at 25 , 454 P.3d at 1108 (quoting Baruch, 154 Idaho at 741, 302 P.3d at 366). 2022That said, “[c]ommingling of separate and community property does not convert the separate property to community property where the separate property can be identified through either direct tracing or accounting.” Papin, 166 Idaho at 25 , 454 P.3d at 1108 (quoting Baruch, 154 Idaho at 741, 302 P.3d at 366). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.