Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rueth v. Stategreen2 sentences2025The decision whether to bifurcate a trial is “in the discretion of the trial court.” Rueth v. State, 103 Idaho 74, 80 , 644 P.2d 1333, 1339 (1982). 2025The decision whether to bifurcate a trial is “in the discretion of the trial court.” Rueth v. State, 103 Idaho 74, 80 , 644 P.2d 1333, 1339 (1982). | 2 | 2 |
Mahurin v. Stategreen2 sentences2006IDAPA 39.02.72.300.01; see also In re Mahurin, 140 Idaho 656 , 659 n. 2, 99 P.3d 125 , 128 n. 2 (Ct.App.2004). 2006IDAPA 39.02.72.300.01; see also In re Mahurin, 140 Idaho 656 , 659 n. 2, 99 P.3d 125 , 128 n. 2 (Ct.App.2004). | 2 | 2 |
Reisenauer v. State, Dept. of Highwaysgreen2 sentences2025“An inverse condemnation case is a civil action predicated upon our Idaho constitution.” Reisenauer v. State, Dep’t of Highways, 120 Idaho 36, 39 , 813 P.2d 375, 378 (Ct. App. 1991). 2025“An inverse condemnation case is a civil action predicated upon our Idaho constitution.” Reisenauer v. State, Dep’t of Highways, 120 Idaho 36, 39 , 813 P.2d 375, 378 (Ct. App. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
Idaho Transportation Department Board v. HJ Gratholgreen2 sentences2015The district court then granted ITD’s motion for possession and issued an order of condemnation, which this Court affirmed in Department of Transportation v. HJ Grathol (Grathol I), 153 Idaho 87, 93 , 278 P.3d 957, 963 (2012). 2015The district court then granted ITD’s motion for possession and issued an order of condemnation, which this Court affirmed in Department of Transportation v. HJ Grathol (Grathol I), 153 Idaho 87, 93 , 278 P.3d 957, 963 (2012). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Killinger v. Twin Falls Highway District
green
2 sentences2025Public Trust/Dedicated Access In Appellants’ opposition to ITD’s motion for summary judgment, they argued ITD took property dedicated to the public trust as an easement. (citing Killinger v. Twin Falls Highway Dist., 135 Idaho 322 , 17 P.3d 266 (2000)). 2025Public Trust/Dedicated Access In Appellants’ opposition to ITD’s motion for summary judgment, they argued ITD took property dedicated to the public trust as an easement. (citing Killinger v. Twin Falls Highway Dist., 135 Idaho 322 , 17 P.3d 266 (2000)). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Steven Leslie Williams v. Dept of Transportation
green
2 sentences2014The district court relied on Williams, 153 Idaho 380 , 283 P.3d 127 , for support. 2014The district court relied on Williams, 153 Idaho 380 , 283 P.3d 127 , for support. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.