Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Harigreen2 sentences2026See Hari, 218 Ill. 2d at 297 . 2026See infra ¶ 99 (citing Hari, 218 Ill. 2d at 297 ). ¶ 61 The paragraph the special concurrence quotes was the Hari court’s response to the State’s argument that any error in the court’s failure to give the involuntary intoxication instruction was harmless. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commissiongreen1 sentence2025See id. ¶ 39 Further regarding section 9-230, we note the Commission’s argument that any presumption that ComEd’s actual capital structure is prudent and reasonable would conflict with the Commission’s obligation under section 9-230 to determine whether ComEd’s risk or cost of capital increased because of its affiliation with its parent Exelon Corporation (Exelon). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Ayresgreen1 sentence2020Moore, 207 Ill. 2d at 77-78 ; see also Ayres, 2017 IL 120071, ¶¶ 11, 13 . ¶ 52 Finally, the State’s argument that any error by the court respecting a preliminary Krankel inquiry was harmless is inappropriate because we cannot determine whether an error is harmless in this context without first understanding the bases of defendant’s claim. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Mooregreen2 sentences2020Moore, 207 Ill. 2d at 77-78 ; see also Ayres, 2017 IL 120071, ¶¶ 11, 13 . ¶ 52 Finally, the State’s argument that any error by the court respecting a preliminary Krankel inquiry was harmless is inappropriate because we cannot determine whether an error is harmless in this context without first understanding the bases of defendant’s claim. 2020See Moore, 207 Ill. 2d at 81 . ¶ 53 In sum, defendant was entitled to a preliminary Krankel inquiry, which the trial court did not provide. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Castleberry
green
1 sentence2016This requires us to decide whether his conviction of the Class 2 form of AUUW is constitutionally invalid. 1 In light of the supreme court’s recent decision in 1 As noted, defendant describes his conviction as “void.” Strictly speaking, a judgment is “void” only if the court that entered it lacked jurisdiction (People v. Castleberry, 2015 IL 116916, ¶ 13 ), and it is questionable whether the unconstitutionality of a statute divests a trial court of jurisdiction to enter a conviction (People v. McGuire, 2015 IL App (2d) 131266 , ¶ 13). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Carvajal
green
1 sentence1993We rejected an identical claim by the defendants in Carvajal ( 241 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
People v. Daugherty
green
1 sentence1985(People v. Daugherty (1984), 102 Ill. 2d 533, 545 .) Further, we reject the State’s argument that any error was harmless because counsel’s remarks occurred during opening statements rather than closing arguments. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
People v. Upshire
green
1 sentence1980People v. Upshire (1978), 62 Ill. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.