Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Costa v. Olivengreen2 sentences2017Id. at 541-42 . ¶ 69 Hewitt’s rationale was also pivotal in Costa v. Oliven ( 365 Ill. 2016Id. at 541-42 . ¶ 69 Hewitt’s rationale was also pivotal in Costa v. Oliven ( 365 Ill. | 4 | 4 |
People v. Brewergreen1 sentence2025See People v. Brewer, 2013 IL App (1st) 072821 , ¶ 55 (sentencing judge may consider nature and circumstances of offense and extent of each element of offense). ¶ 48 The trial court also appropriately considered Ayala’s criminal history as an aggravating factor as authorized by statute. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Floresgreen1 sentence2022See Flores, 153 Ill. 2d at 280 (attorney error short of ineffective assistance of counsel does not constitute cause). ¶ 165 For the reasons set forth above, we affirm the trial court’s denial of Ayala’s motion for leave to file a successive petition raising a youth-based sentencing claim under the proportionate penalties clause. ¶ 166 CONCLUSION ¶ 167 For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the trial court’s October 9, 2019, order dismissing defendants’ 2015 petitions, and remand for a third-stage evidentiary hearing at which, consistent with the limitations set forth in this opinion, defendants | 1 | 1 |
People v. Domagalagreen1 sentence2022See Domagala, 2013 IL 113688, ¶¶ 34-35 (evidentiary conflicts are to be resolved at third stage evidentiary hearing). ¶ 130 Accordingly, we find that both Soto and Ayala are entitled to a third-stage evidentiary hearing on their claim that trial counsel labored under a per se or actual conflict of interest. ¶ 131 V. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Scottgreen1 sentence1990(See, e.g., People v. Scott (1990), 194 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ayala v. Fox
green
2 sentences2017Id. at 541-42 . ¶ 69 Hewitt’s rationale was also pivotal in Costa v. Oliven ( 365 Ill. 2016Id. at 541-42 . ¶ 69 Hewitt’s rationale was also pivotal in Costa v. Oliven ( 365 Ill. | 4 | 2016–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.