Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1930–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Evansgreen2 sentences2019See People v. Evans, 174 Ill. 2d 320, 327 (1996) (contract principles prohibit a defendant from seeking to hold the State to its part of a plea bargain while unilaterally seeking to modify his own). 2018See People v. Evans , 174 Ill. 2d 320 , 327, 220 Ill.Dec. 332 , 673 N.E.2d 244 (1996) (contract principles prohibit a defendant from seeking to hold the State to its part of a plea bargain while unilaterally seeking to modify his own). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Whitfield
green
2 sentences2020Referring to People v. Whitfield, 217 Ill. 2d 177 , 840 N.E.2d 658 (2005), she stated: “[Whitfield] was a case where basically the State made a representation as to what the parole term would be, which was made as—as part of the bargain, despite the fact that it was incorrectly stated and not in line with the statute. 2020Referring to People v. Whitfield, 217 Ill. 2d 177 , 840 N.E.2d 658 (2005), she stated: “[Whitfield] was a case where basically the State made a representation as to what the parole term would be, which was made as—as part of the bargain, despite the fact that it was incorrectly stated and not in line with the statute. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. O'Brien
neutral
1 sentence2019In Whitfield, we concluded that we should give weight to Whitfield’s preference, rather than simply giving him an opportunity to withdraw his plea. [Citation.] However, nothing in Whitfield indicates that this specific enforcement remedy is available where, as here, a defendant enters a partially negotiated plea. *** Whitfield’s remedy—based on a ‘benefit of the bargain’ analysis—is inapplicable to defendant’s partially negotiated plea because she received the benefit of the bargain she made with the State.” Id. ¶ 30. - 10 - 2019 IL App (2d) 170030 ¶ 20 As in Snyder, defendant’s agreement with | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Ginsburg v. Bartlett
green
1 sentence1981(Schwitters v. Springer (1908), 236 Ill. 271 , 86 N.E. 102 ; Ginsburg v. Bartlett (1931), 262 Ill. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Fairfield Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kroll
green
1 sentence1981App. 2d 296 , 246 N.E.2d 327 .) The rationale which underlies this so-called benefit of the bargain rule is that the defrauded party is entitled to be placed in the same financial position as he would have been in had the misrepresentations in fact been true. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Schwitters v. Springer
green
2 sentences1981(Schwitters v. Springer (1908), 236 Ill. 271 , 86 N.E. 102 ; Ginsburg v. Bartlett (1931), 262 Ill. 1981(Schwitters v. Springer (1908), 236 Ill. 271 , 86 N.E. 102 ; Ginsburg v. Bartlett (1931), 262 Ill. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
The People v. Rockola
green
1 sentence1935In People v. Rockola, 339 Ill. 474 , we said that “where, in pursuance of a promise of immunity, an accused or witness has testified and by his testimony given incriminating evidence against himself, the State will be required to live up to the bargain as to immunity, and a conviction of the defendant of such crimes as his testimony discloses cannot be sustained.” Even if it may be said the trial court was not in error in sustaining the demurrer to the special plea in bar which set up the immunity, still, as a matter of evidence, the confession of the defendant, obtained under the circumstance | 1 | 1935–1935 |
The People v. Bogolowski
neutral
1 sentence1930(People v. Bogolowski, 317 Ill. 460 ; People v. Bogolowski, 326 id. 253.) It is, however, quite another thing to say that because the State’s attorney offers immunity the witness or the accused must give evidence which incriminates him, or to say that even though he had agreed so to do he is bound to keep that agreement. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.