collection requirement in Illinois

2011Therefore, in Rigsby, 405 Ill.

2011Therefore, in Rigsby, 405 Ill.

2025Finally, in count VIII, plaintiffs sought a judgment declaring that a terminal operator could comply with the collection requirement by collecting the push tax through methods not involving VGTs, such as using a receptacle for players to deposit monies owed under the tax; - 10 - 2025 IL App (2d) 230431 a terminal operator is not required to comply with the collection requirement by exclusively collecting through VGTs; it is not required to pay the City, at its own expense, any difference between the monies that it was able to collect from players for the push tax and the actual amount owed by

2025The City, the court noted, had not disputed that (or was silent regarding whether) - 47 - 2025 IL App (2d) 230431 plaintiff could comply with the Ordinance’s collection requirement by collecting the push tax through methods not involving VGTs.

1987App. 3d 257 , 464 N.E.2d 639 .) IRI is a marketing research firm which designed, developed and maintained computer-based systems and services for the collection and analysis of market information on sales of packaged consumer goods, thereby assisting manufacturers of consumer goods in the testing and evaluation of their marketing plans for new products, media advertising, pricing and sales promotions.

1930Concerning the contention made, of hindering or delaying creditors in the collection of their claim by a transfer of property of this character, it was held in Feltenstein v. Stein, 157 Ill. 19 , as follows: “Where the assignment is general in its character, and fair on its face, as placing all the debtor’s property in the hands of the assignee for equal pro rata distribution among the creditors, the mere fact, that it delays particular creditors in the enforcement of their claims by the ordinary process of law, does not make it fraudulent and void.