Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights Commissiongreen2 sentences2023To establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination, the petitioner must demonstrate: “(i) she was disabled within the definition of the [Act]; (ii) her disability is unrelated to her ability to perform the functions of the job she was hired to perform; and (iii) an adverse job action was taken against her related to her disability.” Kreczko v. Triangle Package Machinery Co., 2016 IL App (1st) 151762, ¶ 37 . ¶ 29 Once a prima facie case is established, “a rebuttable presumption arises that the employer unlawfully discriminated against the petitioner, and the employer may rebut the pre 2023If the employer carries its burden, the presumption of unlawful discrimination falls and the petitioner must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the employer’s articulated reason was “untrue and a pretext for discrimination.” Id. (citing Zaderaka, 131 Ill. 2d at 179 ). ¶ 30 In this case, the Commission did not abuse its discretion by sustaining the dismissal of petitioner’s charge of disability-based discrimination for “lack of substantial evidence.” The Commission properly concluded that petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of disability- based discrimination, where t | 1 | 2 |
Burns v. Bombela-Tobiasgreen1 sentence2023To establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination, the petitioner must demonstrate: “(i) she was disabled within the definition of the [Act]; (ii) her disability is unrelated to her ability to perform the functions of the job she was hired to perform; and (iii) an adverse job action was taken against her related to her disability.” Kreczko v. Triangle Package Machinery Co., 2016 IL App (1st) 151762, ¶ 37 . ¶ 29 Once a prima facie case is established, “a rebuttable presumption arises that the employer unlawfully discriminated against the petitioner, and the employer may rebut the pre | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine
green
2 sentences2019Id. at 257 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 . 2019Id. at 257 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 . | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Raintree Health Care Center v. Illinois Human Rights Commission
green
2 sentences2003Raintree, 173 Ill. 2d at 481 , 672 N.E.2d at 1141 . 2003Raintree, 173 Ill. 2d at 481 , 672 N.E.2d at 1141 . | 2 | 2003–2003 |
BUDZILENI v. Department of Human Rights
green
1 sentence2023If the employer articulates a legitimate reason, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence “that the employer’s reason was untrue and was pretext for discrimination.” Budzileni, 392 Ill. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Young v. Illinois Human Rights Commission
green
1 sentence2023App. 3d 422, 444 (2009)), and “the employer may rebut the presumption by articulating a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its decision.” Young, 2012 IL App (1st) 112204, ¶ 36 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Kreczko v. Triangle Package Machinery Co.
green
1 sentence2023To establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination, the petitioner must demonstrate: “(i) she was disabled within the definition of the [Act]; (ii) her disability is unrelated to her ability to perform the functions of the job she was hired to perform; and (iii) an adverse job action was taken against her related to her disability.” Kreczko v. Triangle Package Machinery Co., 2016 IL App (1st) 151762, ¶ 37 . ¶ 29 Once a prima facie case is established, “a rebuttable presumption arises that the employer unlawfully discriminated against the petitioner, and the employer may rebut the pre | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.