Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bainter v. Village of Algonquingreen2 sentences2002Because only our supreme court can overrule or modify its previous decisions ( Bainter v. Village of Algonquin , 285 Ill. 2002Plaintiff argues that she presented sufficient evidentiary matter to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether she was actually exposed to HIV In the alternative, plaintiff urges this court to carve out a narrow exception to the actual exposure rule to permit recovery — even absent proof of actual exposure — where a plaintiff has been informed by reliable medical sources that she was actually exposed to HIV Because only our supreme court can overrule or modify its previous decisions (Bainter v. Village of Algonquin, 285 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Brzoska v. Olsongreen1 sentence1997See, e.g., Brzoska v. Olson, 668 A.2d 1355 (Del.1995); Russaw v. Martin, 221 Ga.App. 683 , 472 S.E.2d 508 (1996); Neal v. Neal, 125 Idaho 617 , 873 P.2d 871 (1994); Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hosp., 630 So.2d 861 (La.App.1993); K.A.C. v. Benson, 527 N.W.2d 553 (Minn.1995); Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618 (Tenn.1997); Drury v. Baptist Memorial Hosp. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Majca v. Beekil
green
2 sentences2000An actual exposure requirement prevents an individual from recovering damages for fear of contracting AIDS when that fear is based on a lack of information or inaccurate information regarding the transmission of HIV Majca, 183 Ill. 2d at 420-21 , 701 N.E.2d at 1090 . 2000An actual exposure requirement prevents an individual from recovering damages for fear of contracting AIDS when that fear is based on a lack of information or inaccurate information regarding the transmission of HIV Majca, 183 Ill. 2d at 420-21 , 701 N.E.2d at 1090 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Doe v. Surgicare of Joliet, Inc.
green
2 sentences1997The application of the actual exposure requirement is supported by a third district decision in this state, Doe v. Surgicare of Joliet, Inc., 268 Ill.App.3d 793 , 205 Ill.Dec. 593 , 643 N.E.2d 1200 (1994), appeal denied, 158 Ill.2d 550 , 206 Ill.Dec. 835 , 645 N.E.2d 1357 (1994), as well as by decisions in a majority of jurisdictions. 1997The application of the actual exposure requirement is supported by a third district decision in this state, Doe v. Surgicare of Joliet, Inc., 268 Ill.App.3d 793 , 205 Ill.Dec. 593 , 643 N.E.2d 1200 (1994), appeal denied, 158 Ill.2d 550 , 206 Ill.Dec. 835 , 645 N.E.2d 1357 (1994), as well as by decisions in a majority of jurisdictions. | 2 | 1997–1997 |
K.A.C. v. Benson
green
2 sentences1997The court in K.A.C. v. Benson , 527 N.W.2d 553 (Minn. 1995), also listed a number of policy considerations that support an actual exposure requirement: "Proliferation of fear of AIDS claims in the absence of meaningful restrictions would run an equal risk of compromising the availability and affordability of medical, dental and malpractice insurance, medical and dental care, prescription drugs, and blood products. 1997The court in K.A.C. v. Benson, 527 N.W.2d 553 (Minn.1995), also listed a number of policy considerations that support an actual exposure requirement: "Proliferation of fear of AIDS claims in the absence of meaningful restrictions would run an equal risk of compromising the availability and affordability of medical, dental and malpractice insurance, medical and dental care, prescription drugs, and blood products. | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Russaw v. Martin
green
2 sentences1997See, e.g., Brzoska v. Olson, 668 A.2d 1355 (Del.1995); Russaw v. Martin, 221 Ga.App. 683 , 472 S.E.2d 508 (1996); Neal v. Neal, 125 Idaho 617 , 873 P.2d 871 (1994); Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hosp., 630 So.2d 861 (La.App.1993); K.A.C. v. Benson, 527 N.W.2d 553 (Minn.1995); Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618 (Tenn.1997); Drury v. Baptist Memorial Hosp. 1997See, e.g., Brzoska v. Olson, 668 A.2d 1355 (Del.1995); Russaw v. Martin, 221 Ga.App. 683 , 472 S.E.2d 508 (1996); Neal v. Neal, 125 Idaho 617 , 873 P.2d 871 (1994); Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hosp., 630 So.2d 861 (La.App.1993); K.A.C. v. Benson, 527 N.W.2d 553 (Minn.1995); Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618 (Tenn.1997); Drury v. Baptist Memorial Hosp. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Doe v. Northwestern University
green
2 sentences1997According to the opinion authored by Justice McNulty, application of the actual exposure standard in this case would require reversal because plaintiffs have presented adequate evidence of actual exposure. 289 Ill. 1997Furthermore, as I explained in Doe v. Northwestern University, 289 Ill.App.3d 39 , 224 Ill.Dec. 584 , 682 N.E.2d 145 (1997) (DiVito, P.J., specially concurring), an actual exposure requirement is easier to understand and to apply than the standard Justice McNulty proposes. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Bain v. Wells
green
1 sentence1997See, e.g., Brzoska v. Olson, 668 A.2d 1355 (Del.1995); Russaw v. Martin, 221 Ga.App. 683 , 472 S.E.2d 508 (1996); Neal v. Neal, 125 Idaho 617 , 873 P.2d 871 (1994); Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hosp., 630 So.2d 861 (La.App.1993); K.A.C. v. Benson, 527 N.W.2d 553 (Minn.1995); Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618 (Tenn.1997); Drury v. Baptist Memorial Hosp. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Neal v. Neal
green
2 sentences1997See, e.g., Brzoska v. Olson, 668 A.2d 1355 (Del.1995); Russaw v. Martin, 221 Ga.App. 683 , 472 S.E.2d 508 (1996); Neal v. Neal, 125 Idaho 617 , 873 P.2d 871 (1994); Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hosp., 630 So.2d 861 (La.App.1993); K.A.C. v. Benson, 527 N.W.2d 553 (Minn.1995); Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618 (Tenn.1997); Drury v. Baptist Memorial Hosp. 1997See, e.g., Brzoska v. Olson, 668 A.2d 1355 (Del.1995); Russaw v. Martin, 221 Ga.App. 683 , 472 S.E.2d 508 (1996); Neal v. Neal, 125 Idaho 617 , 873 P.2d 871 (1994); Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hosp., 630 So.2d 861 (La.App.1993); K.A.C. v. Benson, 527 N.W.2d 553 (Minn.1995); Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618 (Tenn.1997); Drury v. Baptist Memorial Hosp. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hosp.
green
1 sentence1997See, e.g., Brzoska v. Olson, 668 A.2d 1355 (Del.1995); Russaw v. Martin, 221 Ga.App. 683 , 472 S.E.2d 508 (1996); Neal v. Neal, 125 Idaho 617 , 873 P.2d 871 (1994); Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hosp., 630 So.2d 861 (La.App.1993); K.A.C. v. Benson, 527 N.W.2d 553 (Minn.1995); Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618 (Tenn.1997); Drury v. Baptist Memorial Hosp. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.