late claim (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

late claim in Illinois

7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Equity General Insurance Co. v. Patisgreen
illappct · 1983 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997However, lengthy delays in providing notice are not excused when the delay is caused by the insured's negligence ( Equity General Insurance Co. v. Patis , 119 Ill.

1997However, lengthy delays in providing notice are not excused when the delay is caused by the insured’s negligence (Equity General Insurance Co. v. Patis, 119 Ill.

22
Beggs v. The Board of Education of Murphysboro Community Unit School District No. 186green
ill · 2016 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2024–2025
2 sentences

2025Beggs, 2016 IL 120236 ¶ 50 . ¶ 27 IV.

2024See Beggs, 2016 IL 120236 ¶ 50 . ¶ 21 Plaintiff contends that she was unaware of the 14-day “time limit” to file her claim for back benefits, and only learned of the issue when she participated in the telephone hearing before the referee.

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Byline Bank v. Integra Properties, Inc. green
illappct · 2021
1 sentence

2024Here, however, F&A did not “file a late claim” or “gain a tactical advantage by delaying in filing.” Byline Bank, 2021 IL App (1st) 201021, ¶ 24 .

12024–2024
Hernandez v. Power Construction Co. green
ill · 1978
1 sentence

2019In re Estate of LaPlume, 2014 IL App (2d) 130945 , ¶ 49. ¶ 18 Here, the plaintiff relies on Hernandez v. Power Construction Co., 73 Ill. 2d 90 (1978) to support his argument that he had good cause for filing a late jury demand because the defendants’ late waiver of their jury demands caused him to lose both the benefit of a speedier adjudication and a jury trial.

12019–2019
In re Estate of LaPlume green
illappct · 2014
1 sentence

2019In re Estate of LaPlume, 2014 IL App (2d) 130945 , ¶ 49. ¶ 18 Here, the plaintiff relies on Hernandez v. Power Construction Co., 73 Ill. 2d 90 (1978) to support his argument that he had good cause for filing a late jury demand because the defendants’ late waiver of their jury demands caused him to lose both the benefit of a speedier adjudication and a jury trial.

12019–2019
Satellite Bowl, Inc. v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'n green
michctapp · 1988
2 sentences

1991The Guaranty Fund also relies on Satellite Bowl, Inc. v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Association (1988), 165 Mich. App. 768 , 419 N.W.2d 460 , which did not allow a late claim.

1991The Guaranty Fund also relies on Satellite Bowl, Inc. v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Association (1988), 165 Mich. App. 768 , 419 N.W.2d 460 , which did not allow a late claim.

11991–1991

Where else courts name it

NY 279 (1901–2026) CA 221 (1963–2026) NJ 51 (1903–2025) MA 13 (1958–2024) OR 7 (1989–2025) IL 7 (1991–2025) MN 6 (1986–2003) VI 5 (1982–2014) CT 4 (1964–2010) OH 4 (1984–2003) MD 4 (1970–2012) TX 3 (1997–2008) MO 3 (1997–2020) KS 3 (1991–2008) FL 3 (1981–2003) DC 2 (2014–2016) NV 2 (1967–1975) GA 2 (1967–2017) WA 2 (2018–2021) ME 2 (2015–2024) CO 2 (1979–1981)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check