law or statutory privilege in Illinois

2021July 1, 2014) provides: -5- “When information or documents are withheld from disclosure or discovery on a claim that they are privileged pursuant to a common law or statutory privilege, any such claim shall be made expressly and shall be supported by a description of the nature of the documents, communications or things not produced or disclosed and the exact privilege which is being claimed.” A party claiming that discovery material is privileged “may not merely assert that the matter is confidential and privileged; rather, he should support such a claim ‘either by producing the materials for

2021July 1, 2014) provides: “When information or documents are withheld from disclosure or discovery on a claim that they are privileged pursuant to a common law or statutory privilege, any such claim shall be made expressly and shall be supported by a description of the nature of the documents, communications or things not produced or disclosed and the exact privilege which is being claimed.” A party claiming that discovery material is privileged “may not merely assert that the matter is confidential and privileged; rather, he should support such a claim ‘either by producing the materials for an

2024“However, individuals who merely supply information to those in an advisory role are not members of the control group.” Caldwell, 2017 IL App (2d) 160456, ¶ 70 . ¶ 28 Rule 201(n) addresses claims of privilege during discovery and states: “When information or documents are withheld from disclosure or discovery on a claim that they are privileged pursuant to a common law or statutory privilege, any such claim shall be made expressly and shall be supported by a description of the nature of the documents, communications or things not produced or disclosed and the exact privilege which is being cla

2023July 1, 2014).” Findlay v. Chicago Title Insurance Co., 2022 IL App (1st) 210889 , ¶ 112 n.5; see also FMC Corp. v. Trimac Bulk Transportation Services, Inc., No. 98 C 5894, 2000 WL 1745179 , at *1 (N.D.

2020July 1, 2014): “When information or documents are withheld from disclosure or discovery on a claim that they are privileged pursuant to a common law or statutory privilege, any such claim shall be made expressly and shall be supported by a description of the nature of the documents, communications or things not produced or disclosed and the exact privilege which is being claimed.” Rule 201(n) allows the circuit “court to evaluate the applicability of the asserted privilege and determine the need for an in camera inspection of the documents, and to minimize disputes between the parties.” Custer

1993(See Doyle, 101 Ill. 2d at 10-11 .) The distinction between a defendant who is not subject to liability in tort as opposed to one who is but possesses a common law or statutory immunity is set forth in Northrup: “In order to find the Midlands culpable in this case, as in any case, the court would need to find that the Midlands owed plaintiff a duty of care and that they failed to act in accordance with that duty. *** Since the Midlands met their legal duty of care, their conduct cannot be considered legally culpable, and thus, under Doyle, they are not subject to liability in tort to Northrup.

1986(Ahlers v. Sears, Roebuck Co. (1978), 73 Ill. 2d 259 , 383 N.E.2d 207 .) Plaintiff is now precluded from subsequently suing for civil damages.

1986(Ahlers v. Sears, Roebuck Co. (1978), 73 Ill. 2d 259 , 383 N.E.2d 207 .) Plaintiff is now precluded from subsequently suing for civil damages.