Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Leonardi v. Loyola University of Chicagogreen2 sentences2011“It is not error to permit an expert to testify regarding reports or medical tests performed by other doctors, which the expert examined in reaching his or her own opinion.” Leonardi v. Loyola University of Chicago, 168 Ill. 2d 83, 105 (1995). 2011“It is not error to permit an expert to testify regarding reports or medical tests performed by other doctors, which the expert examined in reaching his or her own opinion.” Leonardi v. Loyola University of Chicago, 168 Ill. 2d 83, 105 (1995). | 2 | 2 |
Lawrence & Allen, Inc. v. Cambridge Human Res. Group, Inc.green2 sentences2010Even if we assume that Metra's motion to reconsider was untimely, any error in failing to strike the motion as such would be harmless since "`a trial court may deny a motion for summary judgment and later change its position and grant the same motion.'" Buffa v. Haideri, 362 Ill.App.3d 532, 538 , 298 Ill.Dec. 295 , 839 N.E.2d 618 (2005), quoting Lawrence & Allen, Inc. v. Cambridge Human Resource Group, Inc., 292 Ill.App.3d 131, 136-37 , 226 Ill.Dec. 331 , 685 N.E.2d *857 434 (1997). 2010Even if we assume that Metra's motion to reconsider was untimely, any error in failing to strike the motion as such would be harmless since "`a trial court may deny a motion for summary judgment and later change its position and grant the same motion.'" Buffa v. Haideri, 362 Ill.App.3d 532, 538 , 298 Ill.Dec. 295 , 839 N.E.2d 618 (2005), quoting Lawrence & Allen, Inc. v. Cambridge Human Resource Group, Inc., 292 Ill.App.3d 131, 136-37 , 226 Ill.Dec. 331 , 685 N.E.2d *857 434 (1997). | 1 | 2 |
Buffa v. Haiderigreen2 sentences2010Even if we assume that Metra's motion to reconsider was untimely, any error in failing to strike the motion as such would be harmless since "`a trial court may deny a motion for summary judgment and later change its position and grant the same motion.'" Buffa v. Haideri, 362 Ill.App.3d 532, 538 , 298 Ill.Dec. 295 , 839 N.E.2d 618 (2005), quoting Lawrence & Allen, Inc. v. Cambridge Human Resource Group, Inc., 292 Ill.App.3d 131, 136-37 , 226 Ill.Dec. 331 , 685 N.E.2d *857 434 (1997). 2010Even if we assume that Metra's motion to reconsider was untimely, any error in failing to strike the motion as such would be harmless since "`a trial court may deny a motion for summary judgment and later change its position and grant the same motion.'" Buffa v. Haideri, 362 Ill.App.3d 532, 538 , 298 Ill.Dec. 295 , 839 N.E.2d 618 (2005), quoting Lawrence & Allen, Inc. v. Cambridge Human Resource Group, Inc., 292 Ill.App.3d 131, 136-37 , 226 Ill.Dec. 331 , 685 N.E.2d *857 434 (1997). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fletcher v. Chicago Rail Link, L.L.C.
green
1 sentence2025Soukup requested that the trial court find that the ICC safety regulations are safety statutes under FELA, citing Fletcher v. Chicago Rail Link, LLC, 568 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2009). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Neuswanger v. Ikegai America Corp.
green
1 sentence2022App. 3d 506 (2004), and Neuswanger v. Ikegai America Corp., 221 Ill. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Shields v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.
green
1 sentence2022Metra’s motion asserted that Dameron expressly overruled the caselaw that was the basis of Horn’s objection to Metra’s motion to quash the subpoena to Subrosa (specifically, Shields v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry., 353 Ill. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Stone v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
green
1 sentence2017In part, the district court rejected Metra’s argument that the sledgehammer was “the safest tool to use on the job” because witnesses established that this tool “may not have been the appropriate tool for breaking up the concrete.” Id. at *8-9 (plaintiff is permitted “to bring forth evidence of safer, alternative methods to show that the defendant was negligent in not providing such methods” (citing Stone, 344 U.S. at 409 )). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.