Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2020–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Riveragreen1 sentence2024See People v. Rivera, 198 Ill. 2d 364, 371 (2001) (no partial summary dismissals). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Beamangreen1 sentence2022People v. Beaman, 229 Ill. 2d 56, 71 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
Larson v. Wexford Health Sourcesgreen1 sentence2021See Larson, 2012 IL App (1st) 112065, ¶ 27 . | 1 | 1 |
People v. Eddmondsgreen1 sentence2020People v. Eddmonds, 143 Ill. 2d 501, 510 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
People v. LaPointegreen1 sentence2020(West 2016); People v. LaPointe, 227 Ill. 2d 39, 43 (2007). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Savage
green
1 sentence2023Savage, 2020 IL App (1st) 173135 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
1 sentence2020On appeal, defendant argues that we should remand his successive postconviction petition for second-stage proceedings where he sufficiently established No. 1-17-1273 the cause and prejudice required to excuse his failure to include that information in his first postconviction petition, which was a non-frivolous claim that the State violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), by failing to disclose that it did not charge a witness with possession of cocaine because she cooperated in defendant’s case. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Hodges
green
2 sentences2020“We review de novo the dismissal of a postconviction petition without an evidentiary hearing.” Id. ¶ 37 (citing Hodges, 234 Ill. 2d at 9 ). ¶ 36 Defendant asserts that his petition stated a non-frivolous claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. 2020“To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance *** a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance ‘fell below an objective standard of reasonableness’ - 12 - No. 1-17-0005 and that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. [Citation.] At the first stage of postconviction proceedings under the Act, a petition alleging ineffective assistance may not be summarily dismissed if (i) it is arguable that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (ii) it is arguable that the defendant was prejudiced.” Hodges, 234 Ill. 2d at 17 . ¶ 37 On appeal, the so | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Rissley
green
1 sentence2020“We review de novo the dismissal of a postconviction petition without an evidentiary hearing.” Id. ¶ 37 (citing Hodges, 234 Ill. 2d at 9 ). ¶ 36 Defendant asserts that his petition stated a non-frivolous claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.