Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Capital One Bank, N.A. v. Czekala
green
2 sentences2012The intent of the plaintiff is a pivotal inquiry in the determination of whether a particular case involves a misnomer or mistaken identity. 379 Ill. 2010The intent of the plaintiff is a pivotal inquiry in the determination of whether a particular case involves misnomer or mistaken identity.’ ” Czekala, 379 Ill. | 5 | 2010–2021 |
Barbour v. Fred Berglund & Sons, Inc.
green
2 sentences2010App. 3d at 743 , 884 N.E.2d at 1212 , quoting Barbour, 208 Ill. 2010App. 3d at 743 , 884 N.E.2d at 1212 , quoting, Barbour, 208 Ill. | 4 | 2008–2010 |