Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Neder v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2004Ed. 2d at 61 , 119 S. Ct. at 1845 (Scalia, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Souter and Ginsburg, JJ.) (‘The Court’s decision today [in Neder] is the only instance I know of (or could conceive of) in which the remedy for a constitutional violation by a trial judge (making the determination of criminal guilt reserved to the jury) is a repetition of the same constitutional violation by the appellate court (making the determination of criminal guilt reserved to the jury.)’). 2004Ed. 2d at 61 , 119 S. Ct. at 1845 (Scalia, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Souter and Ginsburg, JJ.) ('The Court's decision today [in Neder ] is the only instance I know of (or could conceive of) in which the remedy for a constitutional violation by a trial judge (making the determination of criminal guilt reserved to the jury) is a repetition of the same constitutional violation by the appellate court (making the determination of criminal guilt reserved to the jury)'). | 4 | 4 |
DeSMET EX REL. v. County of Rock Islandgreen2 sentences2011City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B., 211 Ill.2d 456, 477 , 286 Ill.Dec. 75 , 813 N.E.2d 132 (2004); see also DeSmet v. County of Rock Island, 219 Ill.2d 497, 510 , 302 Ill.Dec. 466 , 848 N.E.2d 1030 (2006); In re Branning, 285 Ill.App.3d 405, 410 , 220 Ill.Dec. 920 , 674 N.E.2d 463 (1996) (rule of construing a *1078 statute so as to uphold its constitutionality when reasonably possible is not a license to rewrite legislation). 2011City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B., 211 Ill.2d 456, 477 , 286 Ill.Dec. 75 , 813 N.E.2d 132 (2004); see also DeSmet v. County of Rock Island, 219 Ill.2d 497, 510 , 302 Ill.Dec. 466 , 848 N.E.2d 1030 (2006); In re Branning, 285 Ill.App.3d 405, 410 , 220 Ill.Dec. 920 , 674 N.E.2d 463 (1996) (rule of construing a *1078 statute so as to uphold its constitutionality when reasonably possible is not a license to rewrite legislation). | 2 | 2 |
City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B.green2 sentences2011City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B., 211 Ill.2d 456, 477 , 286 Ill.Dec. 75 , 813 N.E.2d 132 (2004); see also DeSmet v. County of Rock Island, 219 Ill.2d 497, 510 , 302 Ill.Dec. 466 , 848 N.E.2d 1030 (2006); In re Branning, 285 Ill.App.3d 405, 410 , 220 Ill.Dec. 920 , 674 N.E.2d 463 (1996) (rule of construing a *1078 statute so as to uphold its constitutionality when reasonably possible is not a license to rewrite legislation). 2011City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B., 211 Ill.2d 456, 477 , 286 Ill.Dec. 75 , 813 N.E.2d 132 (2004); see also DeSmet v. County of Rock Island, 219 Ill.2d 497, 510 , 302 Ill.Dec. 466 , 848 N.E.2d 1030 (2006); In re Branning, 285 Ill.App.3d 405, 410 , 220 Ill.Dec. 920 , 674 N.E.2d 463 (1996) (rule of construing a *1078 statute so as to uphold its constitutionality when reasonably possible is not a license to rewrite legislation). | 1 | 2 |
People v. Branninggreen2 sentences2011City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B., 211 Ill.2d 456, 477 , 286 Ill.Dec. 75 , 813 N.E.2d 132 (2004); see also DeSmet v. County of Rock Island, 219 Ill.2d 497, 510 , 302 Ill.Dec. 466 , 848 N.E.2d 1030 (2006); In re Branning, 285 Ill.App.3d 405, 410 , 220 Ill.Dec. 920 , 674 N.E.2d 463 (1996) (rule of construing a *1078 statute so as to uphold its constitutionality when reasonably possible is not a license to rewrite legislation). 2011City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B., 211 Ill.2d 456, 477 , 286 Ill.Dec. 75 , 813 N.E.2d 132 (2004); see also DeSmet v. County of Rock Island, 219 Ill.2d 497, 510 , 302 Ill.Dec. 466 , 848 N.E.2d 1030 (2006); In re Branning, 285 Ill.App.3d 405, 410 , 220 Ill.Dec. 920 , 674 N.E.2d 463 (1996) (rule of construing a *1078 statute so as to uphold its constitutionality when reasonably possible is not a license to rewrite legislation). | 1 | 2 |
James William Bishop v. Jim Rose, Wardengreen1 sentence2020See id. - 14 - ¶ 71 Thus, we disagree with defendant’s synthesis of Bishop. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Gaudingreen2 sentences2003Strict adherence to the Apprendi rule here would avoid this situation, and would honor the "surpassing[ly] importan[t]" constitutional protections that entitle a criminal defendant to "`a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.'" Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 476-77 , 120 S.Ct. at 2355-56 , 147 L.Ed.2d at 447 , quoting United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 510 , 115 S.Ct. 2310, 2313 , 132 L.Ed.2d 444, 449 (1995); see In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364 , 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1073 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368, 375 (1970) ("[T]he Due Process 2003Strict adherence to the Apprendi rule here would avoid this situation, and would honor the "surpassing[ly] importan[t]" constitutional protections that entitle a criminal defendant to "`a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.'" Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 476-77 , 120 S.Ct. at 2355-56 , 147 L.Ed.2d at 447 , quoting United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 510 , 115 S.Ct. 2310, 2313 , 132 L.Ed.2d 444, 449 (1995); see In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364 , 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1073 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368, 375 (1970) ("[T]he Due Process | 1 | 1 |
In Re WINSHIPgreen2 sentences2003Strict adherence to the Apprendi rule here would avoid this situation, and would honor the "surpassing[ly] importan[t]" constitutional protections that entitle a criminal defendant to "`a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.'" Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 476-77 , 120 S.Ct. at 2355-56 , 147 L.Ed.2d at 447 , quoting United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 510 , 115 S.Ct. 2310, 2313 , 132 L.Ed.2d 444, 449 (1995); see In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364 , 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1073 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368, 375 (1970) ("[T]he Due Process 2003Strict adherence to the Apprendi rule here would avoid this situation, and would honor the "surpassing[ly] importan[t]" constitutional protections that entitle a criminal defendant to "`a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.'" Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 476-77 , 120 S.Ct. at 2355-56 , 147 L.Ed.2d at 447 , quoting United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 510 , 115 S.Ct. 2310, 2313 , 132 L.Ed.2d 444, 449 (1995); see In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364 , 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1073 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368, 375 (1970) ("[T]he Due Process | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Thurow
green
2 sentences2004Strict adherence to the Apprendi rule here would avoid this situation[ ] and would honor the ‘surpassingly] importan[t]’ constitutional protections that entitle a criminal defendant to ‘ “a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.” ’ [Citations.]” Thurow, 203 Ill. 2d at 369-70 , 786 N.E.2d at 1029 . 2004Strict adherence to the Apprendi rule here would avoid this situation[ ] and would honor the ‘surpassingly] importan[t]’ constitutional protections that entitle a criminal defendant to ‘ “a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.” ’ [Citations.]” Thurow, 203 Ill. 2d at 369-70 , 786 N.E.2d at 1029 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Apprendi v. New Jersey
green
2 sentences2003Strict adherence to the Apprendi rule here would avoid this situation, and would honor the “surpassingly] important]” constitutional protections that entitle a criminal defendant to “ ‘a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 476-77 , 147 L. 2003Strict adherence to the Apprendi rule here would avoid this situation, and would honor the “surpassingly] important]” constitutional protections that entitle a criminal defendant to “ ‘a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 476-77 , 147 L. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.