Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of Chicago
green
2 sentences1993(Peoples Gas, 117 Ill. 1993(Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of Chicago (1983), 117 Ill. | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Jurco v. Stuart
green
2 sentences1985Upon the presentation of evidence and legal arguments, a preliminary injunction may then issue in order to maintain the status quo during the pendency of the trial on the merits. ( 110 Ill. 1983App. 3d 405, 408 , 442 N.E.2d 633 .) The temporary restraining order is an emergency remedy issued to maintain the status quo until a hearing can be held on an application for a preliminary injunction. | 2 | 1983–1985 |
Lawter International, Inc. v. Carroll
green
2 sentences1983The court noted that although the order stated it “shall remain in full force and effect pending further orders,” the net effect of the language was not to make the order of unlimited duration as the defendants contended but rather the order was issued to maintain the status quo until the hearing on a preliminary injunction could be completed. 107 Ill. 1982App. 3d 938 , 438 N.E.2d 590 .) This holding comports with the rationale that a temporary restraining order is an emergency proceeding to maintain the status quo until a hearing can be held on the preliminary injunction. | 2 | 1982–1983 |
McHenry County Sheriff v. McHenry County Department of Health
green
1 sentence2020The court then recounted the elements necessary to entitle a party to the entry of a temporary restraining order: (1) the party possesses a certain and clearly ascertainable right in need of protection, (2) the party lacks an adequate remedy at law, (3) the party will experience irreparable harm without the protection of the temporary restraining order, and (4) the party has a -7- 2020 IL App (2d) 200339 likelihood of success on the merits. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Bismarck Hotel Co. v. Sutherland
green
1 sentence1983(Bismarck Hotel Co. v. Sutherland (1980), 92 Ill. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
ME Stein & Co. v. Jones
neutral
1 sentence1978Stat. 1975, ch. 69, par. 3 — 1.) The general purpose of a temporary restraining order is to preserve the status quo until a hearing can be had to determine whether a preliminary injunction should issue Kirchenberg v. Chicago Transit Authority, 13 Ill. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Kirchenberg v. Chicago Transit Authority
neutral
1 sentence1978App. 3d 184 , 300 N.E.2d 482 (1st Dist. 1973). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.