Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1922–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Petersen v. Corrubiagreen1 sentence2012See Petersen, 21 Ill. 2d at 534 (granting a prescriptive easement was “equitable and proper” under the circumstances). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Estate of Beider
green
2 sentences2003Beider , 268 Ill. 2003Beider, 268 Ill. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Pearson v. McBean
neutral
2 sentences1964Eather it is a specific act “adopted for the purpose of facilitating an early settlement of estates, and a failure to file a claim within a statutory period bars the claim from participating in the inventoried assets of the estate.” Alderson v. Alderson’s Estate, 226 Ill App 176; and the cases cited therein, Wingate v. Pool, 25 Ill 118; Waughop v. Bartlett, 165 Ill 124, 46 NE 197 ; Pearson v. McBean, 231 Ill 536, 83 NE 173 ; Union Trust Co. v. Shoemaker, 258 Ill 564, 101 NE 1050 . 1922Wingate v. Pool, 25 Ill. 118 ; Waughop v. Bartlett, 165 Ill. 124 ; Pearson v. McBean, 231 Ill. 536 ; Union Trust Co. v. Shoemaker, 258 Ill. 564, at p. 571 . | 2 | 1922–1964 |
Union Trust Co. v. Shoemaker
green
2 sentences1964Eather it is a specific act “adopted for the purpose of facilitating an early settlement of estates, and a failure to file a claim within a statutory period bars the claim from participating in the inventoried assets of the estate.” Alderson v. Alderson’s Estate, 226 Ill App 176; and the cases cited therein, Wingate v. Pool, 25 Ill 118; Waughop v. Bartlett, 165 Ill 124, 46 NE 197 ; Pearson v. McBean, 231 Ill 536, 83 NE 173 ; Union Trust Co. v. Shoemaker, 258 Ill 564, 101 NE 1050 . 1922Wingate v. Pool, 25 Ill. 118 ; Waughop v. Bartlett, 165 Ill. 124 ; Pearson v. McBean, 231 Ill. 536 ; Union Trust Co. v. Shoemaker, 258 Ill. 564, at p. 571 . | 2 | 1922–1964 |
Dichtl v. Foster McGaw Hospital
green
1 sentence1994(Garawany, 80 Ill. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Pratt v. Baker
green
2 sentences1972In re Baker’s Estate, 48 Ill.App.2d 442 , 199 N.E.2d 307 . 1972In re Baker’s Estate, 48 Ill.App.2d 442 , 199 N.E.2d 307 . | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Farwell v. Sturges
green
1 sentence1964Eather it is a specific act “adopted for the purpose of facilitating an early settlement of estates, and a failure to file a claim within a statutory period bars the claim from participating in the inventoried assets of the estate.” Alderson v. Alderson’s Estate, 226 Ill App 176; and the cases cited therein, Wingate v. Pool, 25 Ill 118; Waughop v. Bartlett, 165 Ill 124, 46 NE 197 ; Pearson v. McBean, 231 Ill 536, 83 NE 173 ; Union Trust Co. v. Shoemaker, 258 Ill 564, 101 NE 1050 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Wingate v. Pool
green
1 sentence1922Wingate v. Pool, 25 Ill. 118 ; Waughop v. Bartlett, 165 Ill. 124 ; Pearson v. McBean, 231 Ill. 536 ; Union Trust Co. v. Shoemaker, 258 Ill. 564, at p. 571 . | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Waughop v. Bartlett
green
1 sentence1922Wingate v. Pool, 25 Ill. 118 ; Waughop v. Bartlett, 165 Ill. 124 ; Pearson v. McBean, 231 Ill. 536 ; Union Trust Co. v. Shoemaker, 258 Ill. 564, at p. 571 . | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.