Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wheeling Dollar Savings & Trust Co. v. Singergreen1 sentence2013See, e.g., Estate of Ford v. Ford, 82 P.3d 747, 754 (Cal. 2004); Wheeling Dollar Savings & Trust Co. v. Singer, 250 S.E.2d 369, 373-74 (W. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Estate of Fordgreen1 sentence2013See, e.g., Estate of Ford v. Ford, 82 P.3d 747, 754 (Cal. 2004); Wheeling Dollar Savings & Trust Co. v. Singer, 250 S.E.2d 369, 373-74 (W. | 1 | 1 |
General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co.green2 sentences2007Applying the Illinois Supreme Court’s holding in General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co., 215 Ill. 2d 146, 166 , 828 N.E.2d 1092 (2005) (General Agents), that an insurer cannot recover defense costs paid pursuant to a reservation of rights absent a provision entitling it to such relief, the court concluded that, because the insurance policy in this case likewise contained no provision allowing Steadfast to recoup defense costs, Steadfast could not recover the costs it expended defending Caremark in the underlying actions. 2007Applying the Illinois Supreme Court’s holding in General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co., 215 Ill. 2d 146, 166 , 828 N.E.2d 1092 (2005) (General Agents), that an insurer cannot recover defense costs paid pursuant to a reservation of rights absent a provision entitling it to such relief, the court concluded that, because the insurance policy in this case likewise contained no provision allowing Steadfast to recoup defense costs, Steadfast could not recover the costs it expended defending Caremark in the underlying actions. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DeHart v. DeHart
green
2 sentences2014DeHart, 2013 IL 114137, ¶ 53 . 2014DeHart, 2013 IL 114137, ¶ 53 . | 2 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Bynum
green
2 sentences2002Bynum , 257 Ill. 2002Bynum, 257 Ill. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences2023Continuing Claims Exclusion ¶ 185 SPCA also asserts on appeal that the “continuing claim exclusion” in the Steadfast Policy does not apply because the language is “hopelessly ambiguous” and because the claims alleged by Novak in his 2007 IDHR Claim were distinct, different instances of discrimination from the claims made in the 2009 Novak Counterclaims. ¶ 186 When construing a provision in an insurance policy that excludes or limits coverage, we read it narrowly; “the applicability of the exclusion [provision] must be clear and free from doubt.” Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. 2023Continuing Claims Exclusion ¶ 185 SPCA also asserts on appeal that the “continuing claim exclusion” in the Steadfast Policy does not apply because the language is “hopelessly ambiguous” and because the claims alleged by Novak in his 2007 IDHR Claim were distinct, different instances of discrimination from the claims made in the 2009 Novak Counterclaims. ¶ 186 When construing a provision in an insurance policy that excludes or limits coverage, we read it narrowly; “the applicability of the exclusion [provision] must be clear and free from doubt.” Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Steadfast Insurance v. Caremark RX, Inc.
green
1 sentence2007Steadfast I, 359 Ill. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.