Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hinojasa v. Automatic Elevator Co.green1 sentence1999See Hinojasa, 92 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Bainter v. Lamoine LP Gas Co.green1 sentence1990See Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A comment f, at 350-51 (1965); see also Bainter v. Lamoine LP Gas Co. (1974), 24 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cassidy v. China Vitamins, LLC
green
2 sentences2019Because the conditions set forth in section 2-621(b) result in the dismissal of a defendant that is not the product manufacturer, that section is sometimes deemed the “seller’s exception.” 2017 IL App (1st) 160933, ¶ 19 . 2018Because the conditions set forth in section 2-621(b) result in the dismissal of a defendant that is not the product manufacturer, that section is sometimes deemed the "seller's exception." 2017 IL App (1st) 160933 , ¶ 19, 418 Ill.Dec. 110 , 89 N.E.3d 944 . | 3 | 2018–2019 |
Cunningham v. MacNeal Memorial Hospital
green
1 sentence1973In Cunningham v. Mac Neal Memorial Hospital (1970), 47 Ill.2d 443 , 268 N.E.2d 897 , the Supreme Court of Illinois held that a hospital which supplied defective blood to a patient who subsequently contracted serum hepatitis therefrom was engaged in the business of selling blood for transfusions within the doctrine of strict tort liability. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Suvada v. White Motor Co.
green
2 sentences1969The question before this court is whether or not the doctrine of strict tort liability, as laid down in Suvada v. White Motor Co., 32 Ill.2d 612 , 210 NE2d 182 (1965), is applicable. 1969The question before this court is whether or not the doctrine of strict tort liability, as laid down in Suvada v. White Motor Co., 32 Ill2d 612, 210 NE2d 182 (1965), is applicable. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.