Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1957–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Marriage of Toolegreen1 sentence2025App. 3d 640, 664 (2008) (finding that even if the trial court made a valuation error, the error was harmless in light of the trial court’s distribution of the $8.7 million marital estate); In re Marriage of Toole, 273 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
In re Ballgreen1 sentence2024The court’s order stated that plaintiff “principally” argued that the fifth prerequisite was not met (i.e., he did not “succeed” and obtain some benefit in the prior proceeding) because his bankruptcy case was 20 No. 1-22-1841 dismissed without a discharge of his debts. 4 The court found that the mere confirmation of his bankruptcy plan provided a benefit to plaintiff. ¶ 63 The Seymour court, however, questioned what “a postpetition, postconfirmation, unliquidated cause of action is worth to debtors’ creditors in a chapter 13 bankruptcy,” and it observed that the few federal decisions addressi | 1 | 1 |
K. Dale Wissman, Sheryll Wissman v. Pittsburgh National Bankgreen1 sentence2024The court’s order stated that plaintiff “principally” argued that the fifth prerequisite was not met (i.e., he did not “succeed” and obtain some benefit in the prior proceeding) because his bankruptcy case was 20 No. 1-22-1841 dismissed without a discharge of his debts. 4 The court found that the mere confirmation of his bankruptcy plan provided a benefit to plaintiff. ¶ 63 The Seymour court, however, questioned what “a postpetition, postconfirmation, unliquidated cause of action is worth to debtors’ creditors in a chapter 13 bankruptcy,” and it observed that the few federal decisions addressi | 1 | 1 |
Paskill Corp. v. Alcoma Corp.green1 sentence2009See Paskill, 747 A.2d at 555 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stewart v. D. J. Stewart & Co.
green
2 sentences1991(Stewart, 37 Ill. 1990(Stewart, 37 Ill. | 2 | 1990–1991 |
Seymour v. Collins
green
1 sentence2024The court’s order stated that plaintiff “principally” argued that the fifth prerequisite was not met (i.e., he did not “succeed” and obtain some benefit in the prior proceeding) because his bankruptcy case was 20 No. 1-22-1841 dismissed without a discharge of his debts. 4 The court found that the mere confirmation of his bankruptcy plan provided a benefit to plaintiff. ¶ 63 The Seymour court, however, questioned what “a postpetition, postconfirmation, unliquidated cause of action is worth to debtors’ creditors in a chapter 13 bankruptcy,” and it observed that the few federal decisions addressi | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In Re Liquidation of Pine Top Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence2013Id. at 108-09 . -7- ¶ 23 Claimants maintain that Pine Top stands for the proposition that injured parties can and should negotiate settlements to assure the fullest recovery and that their settlement agreement and assignment should be accepted by this court as a bargained-for contractual right. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Institutional Equipment & Interiors, Inc. v. Hughes
green
1 sentence2009We also reject Schweisberger’s argument that deducting the capital gains taxes, professional fees, and costs associated with the sale of the building amounts to a calculation of “fair market value” of his shares, a standard of value that was rejected in Institutional Equipment & Interiors, Inc., 204 Ill. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railroad v. Siegel
neutral
1 sentence1957In commenting upon the valuation rule in Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railroad Co. v. Siegel, 161 Ill. 638 , the court said (p. 647) : “This court and many others have often said that the measure of damages is the market value of the property condemned, and that in arriving at such value it is competent to prove any use, — the highest and best use, — for which it is adapted, and this is undoubtedly the general rule; but this court has never held that the rule is without exception, and that cases may not arise where a proper observance of the constitutional provision that private property sh | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Braun v. Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1957In Braun v. Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railroad Co. 166 Ill. 434 , the court in commenting upon its earlier decision stated that in exceptional cases matters not ordinarily included in arriving at just compensation may be considered so as to aid the jury and the court in determining the fair cash value of the property, in view of its present use. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.