7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ross v. Stategreen1 sentence2017If he cannot afford one, he should apply for pauper counsel.” (App. Vol. II at 56.) It is well-settled pro se litigants are “held to the same standard as trained counsel.” Ross v. State, 877 N.E.2d 829, 833 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007), trans. denied. 5 The trial court also granted Cox’s motion to file a belated appeal. | 1 | 1 |
Creech v. Stategreen1 sentence2014DISCUSSION AND DECSION “[A] defendant may waive the right to appellate review of his sentence as part of a written plea agreement.” Creech v. State, 887 N.E.2d 73, 75 (Ind. 2008).2 Cox pled guilty to five counts of Class A felony child molesting and, as part of his plea agreement, agreed to waive his right to appeal his sentence as long as the trial court sentenced him according to the terms of the plea agreement. | 1 | 1 |
Dullen v. Stategreen1 sentence2006As explained by our Supreme Court in Dullen v. State, 721 N.E.2d 241, 242 (Ind.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 847 , 121 S.Ct. 118 , 148 L.Ed.2d 73 (2000), "It is well settled that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches only at or after the time that adversary judicial proceedings have been initiated against the defendant. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cox v. American Aggregates Corp.
neutral
2 sentences1998Cox v. American Aggregates Corp. , 667 N.E.2d 215 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996). 1997Cox v. American Aggregates Corp., 667 N.E.2d 215 (Ind.Ct.App.1996). | 2 | 1997–1998 |
Owens v. Tennessee
green
1 sentence2006As explained by our Supreme Court in Dullen v. State, 721 N.E.2d 241, 242 (Ind.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 847 , 121 S.Ct. 118 , 148 L.Ed.2d 73 (2000), "It is well settled that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches only at or after the time that adversary judicial proceedings have been initiated against the defendant. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Howard v. Vaughn
green
1 sentence2006As explained by our Supreme Court in Dullen v. State, 721 N.E.2d 241, 242 (Ind.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 847 , 121 S.Ct. 118 , 148 L.Ed.2d 73 (2000), "It is well settled that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches only at or after the time that adversary judicial proceedings have been initiated against the defendant. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Rodriguez v. United States
green
1 sentence2006As explained by our Supreme Court in Dullen v. State, 721 N.E.2d 241, 242 (Ind.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 847 , 121 S.Ct. 118 , 148 L.Ed.2d 73 (2000), "It is well settled that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches only at or after the time that adversary judicial proceedings have been initiated against the defendant. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Starke Circuit Court
green
1 sentence1984Smith v. Starke Circuit Court (1981), Ind., 417 N.E.2d 1115 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Abraham L. Koolish, David F. Koolish and John B. Carnell v. United States
green
1 sentence1980Compare: Koolish v. United States, supra, 340 F.2d at 530-531 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.