7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Metcalf v. Stategreen2 sentences1997Metcalf v. State, 451 N.E.2d 321, 324 (Ind.1983). 1995A missing witness instruction is appropriate "only when a witness is available to be produced by one party but not by the other." Metcalf v. State (1983), Ind., 451 N.E.2d 321, 324 ; Snow, 560 N.E.2d at 73 . | 1 | 3 |
Gossmeyer v. Stategreen2 sentences1997Gossmeyer v. State, 482 N.E.2d 239, 243 (Ind.1985). 1995Gossmeyer v. State (1985), Ind., 482 N.E.2d 239, 243 ; Snow v. State (1990), Ind.App., 560 N.E.2d 69, 72 , trans. denied. | 1 | 3 |
Taylor v. Stategreen1 sentence2007See Taylor v. State, 676 N.E.2d 1044, 1046 (Ind.1997) (finding that the defendant was not entitled to a missing witness instruction where the evidence did not show that the State’s chief investigator of the case was unavailable to the defendant). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Snow v. State
green
2 sentences2007Snow, 560 N.E.2d at 72-73 . 1995A missing witness instruction is appropriate "only when a witness is available to be produced by one party but not by the other." Metcalf v. State (1983), Ind., 451 N.E.2d 321, 324 ; Snow, 560 N.E.2d at 73 . | 2 | 1995–2007 |
Bruce v. State
green
2 sentences1990Metcalf v. State (1983), Ind., 451 N.E.2d 321 ; Bruce v. State (1978), 268 Ind. 180 , 3 875 N.E.2d 1042 ; cert. denied, 489 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 586 , 58 L.Ed.2d 662 . 1983Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 , cert. denied 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 586 , 58 L.Ed.2d 662 ; Banks v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 71 , 351 N.E.2d 4 , cert. denied (1977) 429 U.S. 1077 , 97 S.Ct. 821 , 50 L.Ed.2d 797 . | 2 | 1983–1990 |
Nicholas v. Tennessee Department of Employment Security
green
2 sentences1990Metcalf v. State (1983), Ind., 451 N.E.2d 321 ; Bruce v. State (1978), 268 Ind. 180 , 3 875 N.E.2d 1042 ; cert. denied, 489 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 586 , 58 L.Ed.2d 662 . 1983Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 , cert. denied 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 586 , 58 L.Ed.2d 662 ; Banks v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 71 , 351 N.E.2d 4 , cert. denied (1977) 429 U.S. 1077 , 97 S.Ct. 821 , 50 L.Ed.2d 797 . | 2 | 1983–1990 |
McMahon v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
green
2 sentences1990Metcalf v. State (1983), Ind., 451 N.E.2d 321 ; Bruce v. State (1978), 268 Ind. 180 , 3 875 N.E.2d 1042 ; cert. denied, 489 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 586 , 58 L.Ed.2d 662 . 1983Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 , cert. denied 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 586 , 58 L.Ed.2d 662 ; Banks v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 71 , 351 N.E.2d 4 , cert. denied (1977) 429 U.S. 1077 , 97 S.Ct. 821 , 50 L.Ed.2d 797 . | 2 | 1983–1990 |
Banks v. State
green
2 sentences1983Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 , cert. denied 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 586 , 58 L.Ed.2d 662 ; Banks v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 71 , 351 N.E.2d 4 , cert. denied (1977) 429 U.S. 1077 , 97 S.Ct. 821 , 50 L.Ed.2d 797 . 1983Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 , cert. denied 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 586 , 58 L.Ed.2d 662 ; Banks v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 71 , 351 N.E.2d 4 , cert. denied (1977) 429 U.S. 1077 , 97 S.Ct. 821 , 50 L.Ed.2d 797 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Bynum v. United States
green
1 sentence1983Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 , cert. denied 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 586 , 58 L.Ed.2d 662 ; Banks v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 71 , 351 N.E.2d 4 , cert. denied (1977) 429 U.S. 1077 , 97 S.Ct. 821 , 50 L.Ed.2d 797 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Boothe v. Missouri
green
1 sentence1983Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 , cert. denied 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 586 , 58 L.Ed.2d 662 ; Banks v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 71 , 351 N.E.2d 4 , cert. denied (1977) 429 U.S. 1077 , 97 S.Ct. 821 , 50 L.Ed.2d 797 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Collins v. United States
green
1 sentence1983Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 , cert. denied 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 586 , 58 L.Ed.2d 662 ; Banks v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 71 , 351 N.E.2d 4 , cert. denied (1977) 429 U.S. 1077 , 97 S.Ct. 821 , 50 L.Ed.2d 797 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
CAULDWELL, INC. v. Patterson
neutral
2 sentences1982Hammonds contend that the trial court erred in refusing to give Indiana Pattern Jury Instruction No. 3.13, which reads as follows: “The unexplained failure of a party to produce a witness within its control may give rise to an inference that had such witness testified, the testimony of such witness would have been unfavorable to that party’s case.” This court held in Cauldwell, Inc. et al v. Patterson, (1961) 133 Ind.App. 138 , 177 N.E.2d 490 , that it is not error to refuse to give a missing witness instruction where such witness was as available to both sides. 1982Hammonds contend that the trial court erred in refusing to give Indiana Pattern Jury Instruction No. 3.13, which reads as follows: “The unexplained failure of a party to produce a witness within its control may give rise to an inference that had such witness testified, the testimony of such witness would have been unfavorable to that party’s case.” This court held in Cauldwell, Inc. et al v. Patterson, (1961) 133 Ind.App. 138 , 177 N.E.2d 490 , that it is not error to refuse to give a missing witness instruction where such witness was as available to both sides. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
McCulley v. State
green
2 sentences1982McCulley v. State, (1971) 257 Ind. 135 , 272 N.E.2d 613 .” Since the court had granted the State’s motion for nondisclosure, the defense sought a missing witness instruction. 1982McCulley v. State, (1971) 257 Ind. 135 , 272 N.E.2d 613 .” Since the court had granted the State’s motion for nondisclosure, the defense sought a missing witness instruction. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Chrysler Corporation v. Alumbaugh
green
2 sentences1982More recently, in Chrysler Corporation v. Alumbaugh, (1976) 168 Ind.App. 363 , 342 N.E.2d 908 , we held that the instruction is properly refused when not required by the evidence, or where the witness was available to both sides. 1982More recently, in Chrysler Corporation v. Alumbaugh, (1976) 168 Ind.App. 363 , 342 N.E.2d 908 , we held that the instruction is properly refused when not required by the evidence, or where the witness was available to both sides. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.