Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1985–1995 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State ex rel. A.N.V. v. McCaingreen1 sentence1995See State in the Interest of A.N.V. v. McCain, 26,076 (La.App. 2d Cir.), 637 So.2d 650 ; 643 So.2d 137 ; State v. Givens, 616 So.2d 259 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State in the Interest of Ezell v. Evans, 600 So.2d 90 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992); and Rigaud v. Deruise, 539 So.2d 979 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1989), appeal after remand, 613 So.2d 761 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993). | 1 | 1 |
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES v. Smithgreen1 sentence1987See State Through Department of Health v. Smith, 459 So.2d 146 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984); Bailey v. Douglas, 478 So.2d 172 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1985) writ denied 479 So.2d 365 (La. 1985) and Ellis v. Hicks, 485 So.2d 1003 (La.App. 4th Cir.1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rigaud v. Deruise
green
1 sentence1995See State in the Interest of A.N.V. v. McCain, 26,076 (La.App. 2d Cir.), 637 So.2d 650 ; 643 So.2d 137 ; State v. Givens, 616 So.2d 259 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State in the Interest of Ezell v. Evans, 600 So.2d 90 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992); and Rigaud v. Deruise, 539 So.2d 979 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1989), appeal after remand, 613 So.2d 761 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
STATE, IN INTEREST OF EZELL v. Evans
neutral
1 sentence1995See State in the Interest of A.N.V. v. McCain, 26,076 (La.App. 2d Cir.), 637 So.2d 650 ; 643 So.2d 137 ; State v. Givens, 616 So.2d 259 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State in the Interest of Ezell v. Evans, 600 So.2d 90 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992); and Rigaud v. Deruise, 539 So.2d 979 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1989), appeal after remand, 613 So.2d 761 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Allen v. Automotive Casualty Insurance Co.
neutral
1 sentence1995See State in the Interest of A.N.V. v. McCain, 26,076 (La.App. 2d Cir.), 637 So.2d 650 ; 643 So.2d 137 ; State v. Givens, 616 So.2d 259 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State in the Interest of Ezell v. Evans, 600 So.2d 90 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992); and Rigaud v. Deruise, 539 So.2d 979 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1989), appeal after remand, 613 So.2d 761 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Rigaud v. Deruise
green
1 sentence1995See State in the Interest of A.N.V. v. McCain, 26,076 (La.App. 2d Cir.), 637 So.2d 650 ; 643 So.2d 137 ; State v. Givens, 616 So.2d 259 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State in the Interest of Ezell v. Evans, 600 So.2d 90 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992); and Rigaud v. Deruise, 539 So.2d 979 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1989), appeal after remand, 613 So.2d 761 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Givens
neutral
1 sentence1995See State in the Interest of A.N.V. v. McCain, 26,076 (La.App. 2d Cir.), 637 So.2d 650 ; 643 So.2d 137 ; State v. Givens, 616 So.2d 259 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State in the Interest of Ezell v. Evans, 600 So.2d 90 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992); and Rigaud v. Deruise, 539 So.2d 979 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1989), appeal after remand, 613 So.2d 761 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Soverign Ins. Co. v. Texas Pipeline Co.
neutral
1 sentence1991Sovereign Insurance Company v. Texas Pipeline Company, 470 So.2d 969 (La.App. 1st Cir.1985), amended and affirmed, 488 So.2d 982 (La.1986). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Soverign Ins. Co. v. Texas Pipe Line Co.
green
1 sentence1991Sovereign Insurance Company v. Texas Pipeline Company, 470 So.2d 969 (La.App. 1st Cir.1985), amended and affirmed, 488 So.2d 982 (La.1986). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Bufkin v. Mid-American Indem. Co.
green
1 sentence1989ADMISSIBILITY OF DECEDENT’S BLOOD ALCOHOL TEST (Assignments of Error Numbers 3, 4 and 6) On remand, the plaintiffs assert (1) they properly preserved their chain-of-custody objection to the blood test, (2) the admissibility of the decedent’s blood test is relevant to the issue of the fault of the defendant driver, (3) pursuant to the authority of Bufkin v. Mid-American Indemnity Company, 528 So.2d 589 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1988) and the cases cited therein, a proper chain-of-custody was not established for the admissibility of the blood test, and the trial court erred by allowing the test results i | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Bailey v. Douglas
green
1 sentence1987See State Through Department of Health v. Smith, 459 So.2d 146 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984); Bailey v. Douglas, 478 So.2d 172 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1985) writ denied 479 So.2d 365 (La. 1985) and Ellis v. Hicks, 485 So.2d 1003 (La.App. 4th Cir.1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Graham
green
1 sentence1987State v. Krause, 405 So.2d 832 (La.1981); State v. Morrison, [ 392 So.2d 1037 (La.1980) ] supra; State v. Goetz, [ 374 So.2d 1912 (La.1979)] supra; State v. Graham, [ 360 So.2d 853 (La.1978)] supra; State v. Jones, 316 So.2d 100 (La.1975).” Therefore, according to the dictates of Tanner , the State had the burden of proving the admissibility of the blood analysis. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Krause
green
1 sentence1987State v. Krause, 405 So.2d 832 (La.1981); State v. Morrison, [ 392 So.2d 1037 (La.1980) ] supra; State v. Goetz, [ 374 So.2d 1912 (La.1979)] supra; State v. Graham, [ 360 So.2d 853 (La.1978)] supra; State v. Jones, 316 So.2d 100 (La.1975).” Therefore, according to the dictates of Tanner , the State had the burden of proving the admissibility of the blood analysis. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Bailey v. Douglas
green
1 sentence1987See State Through Department of Health v. Smith, 459 So.2d 146 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984); Bailey v. Douglas, 478 So.2d 172 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1985) writ denied 479 So.2d 365 (La. 1985) and Ellis v. Hicks, 485 So.2d 1003 (La.App. 4th Cir.1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Jones
green
1 sentence1987State v. Krause, 405 So.2d 832 (La.1981); State v. Morrison, [ 392 So.2d 1037 (La.1980) ] supra; State v. Goetz, [ 374 So.2d 1912 (La.1979)] supra; State v. Graham, [ 360 So.2d 853 (La.1978)] supra; State v. Jones, 316 So.2d 100 (La.1975).” Therefore, according to the dictates of Tanner , the State had the burden of proving the admissibility of the blood analysis. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Morrison
green
1 sentence1987State v. Krause, 405 So.2d 832 (La.1981); State v. Morrison, [ 392 So.2d 1037 (La.1980) ] supra; State v. Goetz, [ 374 So.2d 1912 (La.1979)] supra; State v. Graham, [ 360 So.2d 853 (La.1978)] supra; State v. Jones, 316 So.2d 100 (La.1975).” Therefore, according to the dictates of Tanner , the State had the burden of proving the admissibility of the blood analysis. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Ellis v. Hicks
neutral
1 sentence1987See State Through Department of Health v. Smith, 459 So.2d 146 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984); Bailey v. Douglas, 478 So.2d 172 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1985) writ denied 479 So.2d 365 (La. 1985) and Ellis v. Hicks, 485 So.2d 1003 (La.App. 4th Cir.1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Gregory
green
1 sentence1986State v. Gregory, 403 So.2d 1225 (La.1981). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Downer
green
1 sentence1985Defendant relied on State v. Downer, 460 So.2d 1184 (La. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.