Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Carlos
green
2 sentences2017Granier, 15-0608, pp, 2-3, 178 So.3d at 1108 , citing State v. Carlos, 98-1366, pp. 6-7 (La. 7/7/99), 738 So.2d 556, 559 . 2015Carlos , 98-1366 at p. 6-7, 738 So.2d at 559 . | 4 | 2004–2017 |
State v. Crawford
green
2 sentences2020The issue is whether a defendant having had two attorneys appointed to represent him, is entitled to the appointment of a third attorney when he expresses his dissatisfaction with the second.” Id. 2020The issue is whether a defendant having had two attorneys appointed to represent him, is entitled to the appointment of a third attorney when he expresses his dissatisfaction with the second.” Id. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Granier
neutral
1 sentence2017Granier, 15-0608, pp, 2-3, 178 So.3d at 1108 , citing State v. Carlos, 98-1366, pp. 6-7 (La. 7/7/99), 738 So.2d 556, 559 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Oregon v. Bradshaw
green
2 sentences1999The prosecution now has the burden of proving that, after he initiated conversation, the defendant made a valid waiver of counsel, "that is, whether the purported waiver was knowing and intelligent and found to be so under the totality of the circumstances, including the necessary fact that the accused, not the police, reopened the dialogue with the authorities." Oregon v. Bradshaw, supra, 462 U.S. at 1045 , 103 S.Ct. at 2834 , quoting footnote 9, Edwards, 451 U.S. at 486 , 101 S.Ct. at 1885 , [emphasis in original.] In State v. Coston, 98-0470, p. 8 (La. 1999The prosecution now has the burden of proving that, after he initiated conversation, the defendant made a valid waiver of counsel, "that is, whether the purported waiver was knowing and intelligent and found to be so under the totality of the circumstances, including the necessary fact that the accused, not the police, reopened the dialogue with the authorities." Oregon v. Bradshaw, supra, 462 U.S. at 1045 , 103 S.Ct. at 2834 , quoting footnote 9, Edwards, 451 U.S. at 486 , 101 S.Ct. at 1885 , [emphasis in original.] In State v. Coston, 98-0470, p. 8 (La. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Coston
neutral
1 sentence1999App. 4 Cir. 9/16/98), 720 So.2d 714, 719 , writ denied 98-2803 (La.11/24/98), 729 So.2d 565 this Court found that the State had not met its burden when the defendant had asked about having a lawyer present: Notably, the detective's immediate response to this audio taped inquiry was to explain that an attorney could not be appointed because the courts were closed, followed by additional questions concerning the identity of a specific attorney "that will come in to represent you." Even if unintentional, this colloquy creates the impression that unless Mr. Coston knew of an attorney available at | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Coston
neutral
1 sentence1999App. 4 Cir. 9/16/98), 720 So.2d 714, 719 , writ denied 98-2803 (La.11/24/98), 729 So.2d 565 this Court found that the State had not met its burden when the defendant had asked about having a lawyer present: Notably, the detective's immediate response to this audio taped inquiry was to explain that an attorney could not be appointed because the courts were closed, followed by additional questions concerning the identity of a specific attorney "that will come in to represent you." Even if unintentional, this colloquy creates the impression that unless Mr. Coston knew of an attorney available at | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Edwards v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1999The prosecution now has the burden of proving that, after he initiated conversation, the defendant made a valid waiver of counsel, "that is, whether the purported waiver was knowing and intelligent and found to be so under the totality of the circumstances, including the necessary fact that the accused, not the police, reopened the dialogue with the authorities." Oregon v. Bradshaw, supra, 462 U.S. at 1045 , 103 S.Ct. at 2834 , quoting footnote 9, Edwards, 451 U.S. at 486 , 101 S.Ct. at 1885 , [emphasis in original.] In State v. Coston, 98-0470, p. 8 (La. 1999The prosecution now has the burden of proving that, after he initiated conversation, the defendant made a valid waiver of counsel, "that is, whether the purported waiver was knowing and intelligent and found to be so under the totality of the circumstances, including the necessary fact that the accused, not the police, reopened the dialogue with the authorities." Oregon v. Bradshaw, supra, 462 U.S. at 1045 , 103 S.Ct. at 2834 , quoting footnote 9, Edwards, 451 U.S. at 486 , 101 S.Ct. at 1885 , [emphasis in original.] In State v. Coston, 98-0470, p. 8 (La. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.