listed the following factors (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

listed the following factors in Louisiana

7 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1993–1998 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Tuckergreen
la · 1993 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1994–1996
2 sentences

1996Tucker, 626 So.2d at 712-713.

1996State v. Tucker, 626 So.2d at 712-713.

33
Falcon Rice Mill, Inc. v. Community Rice Mill, Inc. And James Vidrinegreen
ca5 · 1984 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995In Falcon Rice Mill, Inc. v. Community Rice Mill, Inc., 725 F.2d 336, 345 (5th Cir.1984), the court listed the following factors: similarity of products, identity of retail outlets and purchasers, identity of advertising media, strength or distinctiveness of the mark or name, defendant's intent, similarity of design, and actual confusion. [11] The articulation of the factors to be considered, vary from court to court, however, those listed above are fairly representative.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Vigreaux v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEV. neutral
la · 1989
1 sentence

1998Id.

11998–1998
STATE, DOTD v. Williamson green
la · 1992
1 sentence

1994In State, Department of Transportation and Development v. Williamson, 597 So.2d 439 (La.1992), this court listed the following factors as those to be taken into consideration in an expropriation case when determining the reasonableness of attorney's fees: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) amount of money involved; (5) extent and character of the work performed; (6) legal knowledge, attainment, and skill of the attorneys; (7) number of appearances made; (8) intricacies *1299 of the facts involved; (9) diligence and skill

11994–1994
Billeaud v. Poledore green
lactapp · 1992
1 sentence

1993In Billeaud v. Poleodore, 603 So.2d 754 (La.App. 1 Cir.1992), the court listed the following factors to consider in determining whether an employee is a borrowed employee: (1) First and foremost, who has the right of control over the employee beyond mere suggestion of details or cooperation; (2) who selected the employee; (3) who paid the employee's wages; (4) who had the right to fire the employee; (5) who furnished the tools and the place to perform the work; (6) whether the new employment was over a considerable length of time; (7) whose work was being done at the time of the accident; (8)

11993–1993

Where else courts name it

TN 11 (1998–2022) LA 7 (1993–1998) MI 6 (2015–2025) IL 6 (1974–2021) MS 4 (1991–2010) WA 3 (1985–2010) CA 2 (2001–2023) OH 2 (2004–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check