Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harris v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See Oken v. State , 367 Md. 191 , 195, 786 A.2d 691 , 693 (2001) (noting Oken's motion to reopen a post[-]conviction proceeding on the basis that the Supreme Court's opinion in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) rendered his sentencing proceeding invalid); see Harris v. State , 160 Md. 2005See Oken v. State, 367 Md. 191, 195 , 786 A.2d 691, 693 (2001) (noting Oken's motion to reopen a postconviction proceeding on the basis that the Supreme Court's opinion in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) rendered his sentencing proceeding invalid); see Harris v. State, 160 Md.App. 78 , 862 A.2d 516 (discussing the defendant's motion to reopen postconviction proceeding on the ground that he had ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel, in addition to ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel); Stovall , 144 DM. | 3 | 3 |
Apprendi v. New Jerseygreen2 sentences2018See Oken v. State , 367 Md. 191 , 195, 786 A.2d 691 , 693 (2001) (noting Oken's motion to reopen a post[-]conviction proceeding on the basis that the Supreme Court's opinion in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) rendered his sentencing proceeding invalid); see Harris v. State , 160 Md. 2018See Oken v. State , 367 Md. 191 , 195, 786 A.2d 691 , 693 (2001) (noting Oken's motion to reopen a post[-]conviction proceeding on the basis that the Supreme Court's opinion in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) rendered his sentencing proceeding invalid); see Harris v. State , 160 Md. | 3 | 3 |
Oken v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See Oken v. State , 367 Md. 191 , 195, 786 A.2d 691 , 693 (2001) (noting Oken's motion to reopen a post[-]conviction proceeding on the basis that the Supreme Court's opinion in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) rendered his sentencing proceeding invalid); see Harris v. State , 160 Md. 2018See Oken v. State , 367 Md. 191 , 195, 786 A.2d 691 , 693 (2001) (noting Oken's motion to reopen a post[-]conviction proceeding on the basis that the Supreme Court's opinion in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) rendered his sentencing proceeding invalid); see Harris v. State , 160 Md. | 3 | 3 |
Oken v. Nuthgreen2 sentences2003See also Oken v. Nuth, 30 F.Supp.2d 877 (detailing the procedural history of Oken's habeas corpus petition, including Oken's motion to declare Maryland a non-opt-in State under the Anti Terrorism Death Penalty Act). 2003See also Oken v. Nuth, 30 F.Supp.2d 877 (detailing the procedural history of Oken’s habeas corpus petition, including Oken's motion to declare Maryland a non-opt-in State under the Anti Terrorism Death Penalty Act). | 2 | 2 |
Stovall v. Stategreen2 sentences2018App. 78 , 862 A.2d 516 [ (2004) ] (discussing the defendant's motion to reopen post[-]conviction proceeding on the ground that he had ineffective assistance of post[-]conviction counsel, in addition to ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel); [ Stovall v. State , 144 Md. 2005App. at 715, 800 A.2d at 34 (holding that a defendant may petition to reopen a postconviction proceeding if postconviction counsel was ineffective). 8 . | 1 | 2 |
Trimble v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Trimble v. State, 300 Md. 387, 401-02 , 478 A.2d 1143, 1150 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1230 , 105 S.Ct. 1231 , 84 L.Ed.2d 368 (1985). 1992Trimble v. State, 300 Md. 387, 401-02 , 478 A.2d 1143, 1150 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1230 , 105 S.Ct. 1231 , 84 L.Ed.2d 368 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2001On May 5, 1994, the court (Judge Dana Levitz), applying the test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), found that trial counsel’s decisions regarding Oken’s defense fell within the ambit of the objective standard of reasonableness in the profession and that a substantially *194 different outcome would not have occurred had counsel acted differently. 2001On May 5, 1994, the court (Judge Dana Levitz), applying the test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), found that trial counsel’s decisions regarding Oken’s defense fell within the ambit of the objective standard of reasonableness in the profession and that a substantially *194 different outcome would not have occurred had counsel acted differently. | 2 | 1996–2001 |
Gilliam v. State
green
2 sentences1992Alternatively, the State asserts that even assuming, arguendo, that Oken’s claim was properly preserved, it fails on the merits because the Supreme Court’s decision in Simmons is not applicable to the instant case, and this Court’s decision in Gilliam v. State, 320 Md. 637 , 579 A.2d 744 (1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1024 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1106 (1991) is fatal to Oken’s contention. 1992Alternatively, the State asserts that even assuming, arguendo, that Oken’s claim was properly preserved, it fails on the merits because the Supreme Court’s decision in Simmons is not applicable to the instant case, and this Court’s decision in Gilliam v. State, 320 Md. 637 , 579 A.2d 744 (1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1024 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1106 (1991) is fatal to Oken’s contention. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Dufour v. Mississippi
green
2 sentences1992Trimble v. State, 300 Md. 387, 401-02 , 478 A.2d 1143, 1150 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1230 , 105 S.Ct. 1231 , 84 L.Ed.2d 368 (1985). 1992Trimble v. State, 300 Md. 387, 401-02 , 478 A.2d 1143, 1150 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1230 , 105 S.Ct. 1231 , 84 L.Ed.2d 368 (1985). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
De Modena v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
green
2 sentences1992Trimble v. State, 300 Md. 387, 401-02 , 478 A.2d 1143, 1150 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1230 , 105 S.Ct. 1231 , 84 L.Ed.2d 368 (1985). 1992Trimble v. State, 300 Md. 387, 401-02 , 478 A.2d 1143, 1150 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1230 , 105 S.Ct. 1231 , 84 L.Ed.2d 368 (1985). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.