Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Damien F.green2 sentences2019Indeed, in Damien F. , this Court found that a juvenile court that refused to permit parents to present evidence to dispute the local department's allegations based on a belief that a shelter care hearing is analogous to a probable cause determination made a "serious error" and "misconstrued the nature of a shelter care hearing." Id. 2015Falls Garden contends that the Circuit Court Judge considered extrinsic evidence of emails and claims that the Circuit Court Judge was required “to either (1) make a finding on the record that such testimony was not a material fact concerning the existence of an agreement to settle or (2) conduct a full plenary hearing to evaluate the witnesses [sic] testimony and credibility regarding the issue.” Falls Garden relies on one case from the Court of Special Appeals, In re Damien F., 182 Md.App. 546 , 958 A.2d 402 (2008), in which our intermediate appellate court, in a child in need of assistance | 2 | 4 |
In Re: O.P.green1 sentence2026See In re O.P., 470 Md. 225, 251 (2020) (“[T]he disputed question at a shelter care hearing – whether continued temporary placement of the child outside the home is warranted pending adjudication of the [child in need of assistance] petition – is conclusively determined by a juvenile court order denying continued shelter care.”); County Comm’rs of Frederick County v. Schrodel, 320 Md. 202, 212 (1990) (concluding that an order blocking Frederick County from prosecuting a condemnation action until it obtains a permit to construct a landfill on the property “conclusively determined that the Count | 1 | 1 |
Schuele v. Case Handyman & Remodeling Services, LLCgreen1 sentence2026See In re O.P., 470 Md. 225, 251 (2020) (“[T]he disputed question at a shelter care hearing – whether continued temporary placement of the child outside the home is warranted pending adjudication of the [child in need of assistance] petition – is conclusively determined by a juvenile court order denying continued shelter care.”); County Comm’rs of Frederick County v. Schrodel, 320 Md. 202, 212 (1990) (concluding that an order blocking Frederick County from prosecuting a condemnation action until it obtains a permit to construct a landfill on the property “conclusively determined that the Count | 1 | 1 |
County Commissioners v. Schrodelgreen1 sentence2026See In re O.P., 470 Md. 225, 251 (2020) (“[T]he disputed question at a shelter care hearing – whether continued temporary placement of the child outside the home is warranted pending adjudication of the [child in need of assistance] petition – is conclusively determined by a juvenile court order denying continued shelter care.”); County Comm’rs of Frederick County v. Schrodel, 320 Md. 202, 212 (1990) (concluding that an order blocking Frederick County from prosecuting a condemnation action until it obtains a permit to construct a landfill on the property “conclusively determined that the Count | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Russell G.
green
2 sentences2006Vol.), Section 3-807(d)(3) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article provides in pertinent part: Detention, community detention, or shelter care may be ordered by a master pending court review of the master's findings, conclusions, and recommendations. [7] "An adjudicatory hearing is a hearing under the Juvenile Causes subtitle of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Maryland Code to determine whether the allegations in a petition for court intervention filed by the county department of social services on behalf of a child, other than the allegation that the child requires t 2006Vol.), Section 3-807(d)(3) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article provides in pertinent part: Detention, community detention, or shelter care may be ordered by a master pending court review of the master's findings, conclusions, and recommendations. [7] "An adjudicatory hearing is a hearing under the Juvenile Causes subtitle of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Maryland Code to determine whether the allegations in a petition for court intervention filed by the county department of social services on behalf of a child, other than the allegation that the child requires t | 1 | 2006–2006 |
In Re Blessen H.
green
2 sentences2006Vol.), Section 3-807(d)(3) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article provides in pertinent part: Detention, community detention, or shelter care may be ordered by a master pending court review of the master's findings, conclusions, and recommendations. [7] "An adjudicatory hearing is a hearing under the Juvenile Causes subtitle of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Maryland Code to determine whether the allegations in a petition for court intervention filed by the county department of social services on behalf of a child, other than the allegation that the child requires t 2006Vol.), Section 3-807(d)(3) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article provides in pertinent part: Detention, community detention, or shelter care may be ordered by a master pending court review of the master's findings, conclusions, and recommendations. [7] "An adjudicatory hearing is a hearing under the Juvenile Causes subtitle of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Maryland Code to determine whether the allegations in a petition for court intervention filed by the county department of social services on behalf of a child, other than the allegation that the child requires t | 1 | 2006–2006 |
In re Vanessa C.
green
2 sentences2001Id. at 456 , 656 A.2d 795 . 2001Id. at 456 , 656 A.2d 795 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.