7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Roginsky v. Blake-Roginskygreen2 sentences2004The twelve factors included in the test are non-exclusive, and "although the court is not required to use a formal checklist, the court must demonstrate consideration of all necessary factors.” Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky, 129 Md.App. 132, 143 , 740 A.2d 125, 130 (1999). 2004The twelve factors included in the test are non-exclusive, and "although the court is not required to use a formal checklist, the court must demonstrate consideration of all necessary factors.” Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky, 129 Md.App. 132, 143 , 740 A.2d 125, 130 (1999). | 2 | 3 |
Ochse v. Henrygreen1 sentence2025See also Ochse v. Henry, 216 Md. | 1 | 1 |
Solomon v. Solomongreen2 sentences2010See Solomon, 383 Md. at 195 n. 15, 857 A.2d at 1120 n. 15 (“The twelve factors included in the test are non-exclusive____”). 2010See Solomon, 383 Md. at 195 n. 15, 857 A.2d at 1120 n. 15 (“The twelve factors included in the test are non-exclusive____”). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 315529green1 sentence2008In Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 , 103 S.Ct. 1933, 1939 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 , 48 n. 3 (1983), the Court, referred to the twelve factors identified, and explained, in great detail in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir.l974):(l) the time and labor required; (2) the novelty and difficulty of the questions presented; (3) the skill requisite to properly perform the legal service; (4) the preclusion of other employment by the attorney due to acceptance of the case; (5) the customary fee; (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent; (7) time limitations impos | 1 | 1 |
Turrisi v. Sanzarogreen2 sentences2005Tracey v. Tracey, 328 Md. 380, 391 , 614 A.2d 590, 596 (1992) see also Turrisi v. Sanzaro, 308 Md. 515, 524-525 , 520 A.2d 1080, 1085 (1987). 2005Tracey v. Tracey, 328 Md. 380, 391 , 614 A.2d 590, 596 (1992) see also Turrisi v. Sanzaro, 308 Md. 515, 524-525 , 520 A.2d 1080, 1085 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
Tracey v. Traceygreen2 sentences2005Tracey v. Tracey, 328 Md. 380, 391 , 614 A.2d 590, 596 (1992) see also Turrisi v. Sanzaro, 308 Md. 515, 524-525 , 520 A.2d 1080, 1085 (1987). 2005Tracey v. Tracey, 328 Md. 380, 391 , 614 A.2d 590, 596 (1992) see also Turrisi v. Sanzaro, 308 Md. 515, 524-525 , 520 A.2d 1080, 1085 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
Ware v. Waregreen2 sentences2003Blaine, 336 Md. at 71-72 , 646 A.2d 413 ; see also Ware, 131 Md.App. at 232-33 , 748 A.2d 1031 (“[A] finding of a mathematical disparity will not automatically trigger an award of indefinite alimony and ... the trial judge must carefully consider all of the twelve factors spelled out by § 11-106(b) that are pertinent to a particular case.”). 2003Blaine, 336 Md. at 71-72 , 646 A.2d 413 ; see also Ware, 131 Md.App. at 232-33 , 748 A.2d 1031 (“[A] finding of a mathematical disparity will not automatically trigger an award of indefinite alimony and ... the trial judge must carefully consider all of the twelve factors spelled out by § 11-106(b) that are pertinent to a particular case.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hensley v. Eckerhart
green
2 sentences2025Of the twelve factors, the Hensley Court characterized “the results obtained” as “crucial . . . in determining the proper amount of an award of attorney’s fees[,]” id. at 440 , particularly where “a plaintiff is deemed ‘prevailing’ even though he [or she] succeeded on only some of his [or her] claims for relief.” Id. at 434 . 2025Of the twelve factors, the Hensley Court characterized “the results obtained” as “crucial . . . in determining the proper amount of an award of attorney’s fees[,]” id. at 440 , particularly where “a plaintiff is deemed ‘prevailing’ even though he [or she] succeeded on only some of his [or her] claims for relief.” Id. at 434 . | 2 | 2008–2025 |
Monmouth Meadows Homeowners Ass'n v. Hamilton
green
2 sentences2011Monmouth, 416 Md. at 336 , 7 A.3d 1 . 2011Monmouth, 416 Md. at 336 , 7 A.3d 1 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Blaine v. Blaine
green
2 sentences2003Blaine, 336 Md. at 71-72 , 646 A.2d 413 ; see also Ware, 131 Md.App. at 232-33 , 748 A.2d 1031 (“[A] finding of a mathematical disparity will not automatically trigger an award of indefinite alimony and ... the trial judge must carefully consider all of the twelve factors spelled out by § 11-106(b) that are pertinent to a particular case.”). 2003Blaine, 336 Md. at 71-72 , 646 A.2d 413 ; see also Ware, 131 Md.App. at 232-33 , 748 A.2d 1031 (“[A] finding of a mathematical disparity will not automatically trigger an award of indefinite alimony and ... the trial judge must carefully consider all of the twelve factors spelled out by § 11-106(b) that are pertinent to a particular case.”). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.