50 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Armstrong v. Armstronggreen2 sentences2020When Douglas Cosentino again appealed the chancellor’s decision after remand, we reversed and rendered judgment 10 Ferguson v. Ferguson, 639 So. 2d 921, 926 (Miss. 1994) (finding that awards of alimony are appropriate if after dividing the marital property there is still inequity between the two parties); Armstrong v. Armstrong, 618 So. 2d 1278, 1280-81 (Miss. 1993) (noting the twelve factors necessary for a chancellor to consider when entering a judgment for alimony). 18 for failure to justify the permanent periodic alimony award when the wife had received $2,615,815 as part of the marital es 2017And then finally, in August 2015, after completing her master’s, degree, Amy saw her salary rise to approximately $51,000 annually, This is an increase of roughly $18,000 since the time of the divorce. 11.17, Alternatively, Amy argues that even if there was a material change of circumstances, the evidence proves that termination was not warranted when considering the twelve factors' set forth under Armstrong v. Armstrong, 618 So.2d 1278, 1280 (Miss. 1993). | 14 | 20 |
In Re Extension of Boundaries of City of Winonagreen2 sentences2007The chancellor then cited the twelve factors outlined in In re Extension of Boundaries of City of Winona, 879 So.2d 966 (2004), to determine whether a municipality has a need for expansion. ¶ 13. 2005"This Court has held that the twelve factors `are only indicia of reasonableness, not separate and distinct tests in and of themselves.'" In re Extension of the Boundaries of The City of Winona, 879 So.2d 966, 972-73 (Miss.2004) ( quoting In re Enlargement and Extension of Municipal Boundaries of City of Biloxi, 744 So.2d 270, 276 (Miss.1999)). | 4 | 5 |
In Re Mun. Boundaries of City of Biloxigreen2 sentences2005This Court has held that the twelve factors "are only indicia of reasonableness, not separate and distinct tests in and of themselves." In re Enlargement and Extension of Municipal Boundaries of City of Biloxi, 744 So.2d at 276 . 2005"This Court has held that the twelve factors `are only indicia of reasonableness, not separate and distinct tests in and of themselves.'" In re Extension of the Boundaries of The City of Winona, 879 So.2d 966, 972-73 (Miss.2004) ( quoting In re Enlargement and Extension of Municipal Boundaries of City of Biloxi, 744 So.2d 270, 276 (Miss.1999)). | 3 | 7 |
Albright v. Albrightgreen2 sentences2009In Albright v. Albright, 437 So.2d 1003, 1005 (Miss.1983), the supreme court set out the following twelve factors chancellors must consider in determining which parent should be awarded custody: (1) the age, health, and sex of the child; (2) the continuity of care prior to the separation; (3) the parenting skills; (4) the willingness and capacity to provide primary child care; (5) the employment and employment responsibilities of the parents; (6) the physical and mental health and ages of the parents; (7) the emotional ties of the parents and child; (8) the moral fitness of the parents; (9) th 2002Albright v. Albright, 437 So.2d 1003, 1005 (Miss.1983). | 2 | 2 |
In Re Enlargement and Extension of Boundaries of City of MacOngreen2 sentences2007In the case of In the Matter of the Enlargement and Extension of the Boundaries of the City of Macon v. City of Macon, 854 So.2d 1029, 1035 (Miss.2003), the Court listed numerous factors to consider when determining whether a city has a reasonable need for expansion. 2006In the case of In the Matter of the Enlargement and Extension of the Boundaries of the City of Macon v. City of Macon, 854 So. 2d 1029, 1035 (Miss. 2003), the Court listed numerous factors to consider when determining whether a city has a reasonable need for expansion. | 2 | 2 |
cluster 315529green2 sentences2007The Court likewise set out the twelve factors to be considered in determining a reasonable attorneys' fee to be awarded: "(1) the time and labor required; (2) the novelty and difficulty of the questions; (3) the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (4) the preclusion of employment by the attorney due to acceptance of the case; (5) the customary fee; (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent; (7) time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances; *521 (8) the amount involved and the results obtained; (9) the experience, reputation, and ability of the attorneys; (10) 2006The Court likewise set out the twelve factors to be considered in determining a reasonable attorneys’ fee to be awarded: “(1) the time and labor required; (2) the novelty and difficulty of the questions; (3) the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (4) the preclusion of employment by the attorney due to acceptance of the case; (5) the customary fee; (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent; (7) time limitations imposed by 42 the client or the circumstances; (8) the amount involved and the results obtained; (9) the experience, reputation, and ability of the attorneys; (10) t | 2 | 2 |
Irma Ruth Halferty v. Pulse Drug Company, Inc., D/B/A Pulse Ambulance Servicegreen2 sentences1996Id. 821 F.2d at 271-72, n. 12 . 1996Id. 821 F.2d at 271-72, n. 12 . | 2 | 2 |
Ferguson v. Fergusongreen1 sentence2020When Douglas Cosentino again appealed the chancellor’s decision after remand, we reversed and rendered judgment 10 Ferguson v. Ferguson, 639 So. 2d 921, 926 (Miss. 1994) (finding that awards of alimony are appropriate if after dividing the marital property there is still inequity between the two parties); Armstrong v. Armstrong, 618 So. 2d 1278, 1280-81 (Miss. 1993) (noting the twelve factors necessary for a chancellor to consider when entering a judgment for alimony). 18 for failure to justify the permanent periodic alimony award when the wife had received $2,615,815 as part of the marital es | 1 | 1 |
Cosentino v. Cosentinogreen1 sentence2020Cosentino v. Cosentino, 986 So. 2d 1065, 1066 (¶¶1- 3) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Elkins v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Next, to determine whether Brian’s statements have substantial in-dicia of reliability, the trial judge must make an on-the-record finding, considering the twelve factors provided in Rule 803(25)’s official comment. 4 However, each factor need not be discussed sepa *183 rately by the trial judge, so long as the record supports a “finding that the victim’s statements bore indicia of reliability.” Elkins v. State, 918 So.2d 828, 883 (¶ 18) (Miss.Ct.App.2005) (citation omitted). ¶ 18. | 1 | 1 |
City of Laurel v. Sharon Waterworks Ass'ngreen1 sentence2006See City of Laurel, 918 So.2d at 1271 . | 1 | 1 |
Parsons v. Parsonsgreen1 sentence2002In his findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment, the chancellor specifically stated that the factors to be considered by the court in awarding alimony were the twelve factors set forth in Parsons v. Parsons, 678 So.2d 701, 703 (Miss. 1996), which cites to Armstrong and sets *420 forth the identical factors. | 1 | 1 |
Hammonds v. Hammondsgreen1 sentence1998Hammonds v. Hammonds, 597 So.2d 653, 654 (Miss.1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Jackson v. Byram Incorporators
green
2 sentences2013City of Jackson, 16 So.3d at 683 . 2010City of Jackson, 16 So. 3d at 683 . | 2 | 2010–2013 |
Hensley v. Eckerhart
green
2 sentences2007The Court likewise set out the twelve factors to be considered in determining a reasonable attorneys' fee to be awarded: "(1) the time and labor required; (2) the novelty and difficulty of the questions; (3) the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (4) the preclusion of employment by the attorney due to acceptance of the case; (5) the customary fee; (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent; (7) time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances; *521 (8) the amount involved and the results obtained; (9) the experience, reputation, and ability of the attorneys; (10) 2006The Court likewise set out the twelve factors to be considered in determining a reasonable attorneys’ fee to be awarded: “(1) the time and labor required; (2) the novelty and difficulty of the questions; (3) the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (4) the preclusion of employment by the attorney due to acceptance of the case; (5) the customary fee; (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent; (7) time limitations imposed by 42 the client or the circumstances; (8) the amount involved and the results obtained; (9) the experience, reputation, and ability of the attorneys; (10) t | 2 | 2006–2007 |
ENLARGEMENT AND EXTENSION OF MUN. BOUNDARIES OF MERIDIAN v. City of Meridian
green
2 sentences2006Chancellor McKenzie's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Final Judgment ("Opinion"), clearly demonstrate that he prudently considered and weighed the proof presented, and analyzed it in conjunction with the twelve factors required to determine the reasonableness vel non of the proposed annexation, as enumerated by this Court in City of Meridian, 662 So.2d at 609 . 2004Chancellor McKenzie’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Final Judgment (“Opinion”), clearly demonstrate that he prudently considered and weighed the proof presented, and analyzed it in conjunction with the twelve factors required to determine the reasonableness vel non of the proposed annexation, as enumerated by this Court in City of Meridian, 662 So.2d at 609 . | 2 | 2004–2006 |
Idaho v. Wright
green
2 sentences2000In that hearing, the trial court specifically received evidence and arguments on the twelve factors identified in Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990), as relevant to a hearsay exception under M.R.E. 803(25). 2000In that hearing, the trial court specifically received evidence and arguments on the twelve factors identified in Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990), as relevant to a hearsay exception under M.R.E. 803(25). | 2 | 1994–2000 |
City of Horn Lake v. City of Southaven
green
1 sentence2019In re City of Southaven, 5 So. 3d at 376-77 . ¶10. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
green
1 sentence2009“The award was not oppressive, unjust, or grossly inadequate.” Rodriguez v. Rodriguez, 2 So.3d 720 (¶ 41) (Miss.Ct.App.2009). ¶ 41. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Ortega v. Lovell
green
1 sentence2001Others cite it only for reasons other than the twelve factors: Ortega v. Lovell, 725 So.2d 199 (Miss.1998) (change in circumstances must adversely affect child); Riley v. Doerner, 677 So.2d 740 (Miss.1996) (principal consideration is best interest of child). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Riley v. Doerner
green
1 sentence2001Others cite it only for reasons other than the twelve factors: Ortega v. Lovell, 725 So.2d 199 (Miss.1998) (change in circumstances must adversely affect child); Riley v. Doerner, 677 So.2d 740 (Miss.1996) (principal consideration is best interest of child). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Matter of Enlargement of Corp. Limits
green
2 sentences1993Matter of Enlargement of Corp. Limits of Hattiesburg, 588 So.2d at 818-19 . 1993Matter of Enlargement of Corp. Limits of Hattiesburg, 588 So.2d at 818-19 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.