7 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Donald Petrin v. Town of Scarboroughgreen2 sentences2017See Petrin, 2016 ME 136, ¶25 , 147 A.3d 842 . 2017See Petrin, 2016 ME 136, ¶25 , 147 A.3d 842 . | 4 | 4 |
Lucas v. Portergreen1 sentence2021Lucas v. Porter, 755 N.W.2d 88, 94-95 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
McCullough v. Town of Sanfordgreen1 sentence2014See McCullough, 687 A.2d at 631 . [¶ 17] Although evidence presented in an abatement hearing is within the Board’s authority to believe or disbelieve, the Board’s finding that Terfloth did not purchase his property in an arm’s-length transaction is unsupported by any evidence in the record. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Northeast Empire Ltd. Partnership 2 v. Town of Ashland
green
2 sentences2020Cf Tetjloth v. Town ofScarbotvttgh, 2014 ME 57 , i/ 17, 90 A.3d 1131 (explaining that "evidence presented in an abatement hearing is within the Board's authority to believe or disbelieve"); No1theast Empi1,, 2003 ME 28 , i/ 15, 818 A.2d 1021 ("A fact-finder who hears inconsistencies, unexplained assertions, and incorrect assumptions in the testimony of a witness is entitled to reject that witness's testimony entirely."). 2020Cf Tetjloth v. Town ofScarbotvttgh, 2014 ME 57 , i/ 17, 90 A.3d 1131 (explaining that "evidence presented in an abatement hearing is within the Board's authority to believe or disbelieve"); No1theast Empi1,, 2003 ME 28 , i/ 15, 818 A.2d 1021 ("A fact-finder who hears inconsistencies, unexplained assertions, and incorrect assumptions in the testimony of a witness is entitled to reject that witness's testimony entirely."). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Marc B. Terfloth v. Town of Scarborough
green
2 sentences2020Cf Tetjloth v. Town ofScarbotvttgh, 2014 ME 57 , i/ 17, 90 A.3d 1131 (explaining that "evidence presented in an abatement hearing is within the Board's authority to believe or disbelieve"); No1theast Empi1,, 2003 ME 28 , i/ 15, 818 A.2d 1021 ("A fact-finder who hears inconsistencies, unexplained assertions, and incorrect assumptions in the testimony of a witness is entitled to reject that witness's testimony entirely."). 2020Cf Tetjloth v. Town ofScarbotvttgh, 2014 ME 57 , i/ 17, 90 A.3d 1131 (explaining that "evidence presented in an abatement hearing is within the Board's authority to believe or disbelieve"); No1theast Empi1,, 2003 ME 28 , i/ 15, 818 A.2d 1021 ("A fact-finder who hears inconsistencies, unexplained assertions, and incorrect assumptions in the testimony of a witness is entitled to reject that witness's testimony entirely."). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.