Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
7 Maine opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State of Maine v. Tara L. Watsongreen1 sentence2025See Watson, 2024 ME 24, ¶ 18 , 319 A.3d 430 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Greenegreen1 sentence2025See State v. Greene, 512 A.2d 330, 334 (Me. 1986) (concluding that when the presiding justice, sua sponte, instructs the jury that what lawyers said in argument was not evidence and later instructs the jurors to view the evidence objectively and 22 at no time did the defendant move for a mistrial, such inaction fails to preserve the errors for appellate review).8 The entry is: Judgment affirmed. | 1 | 1 |
State of Maine v. Craig A. Proctorgreen2 sentences2021See State v. Proctor, 2020 ME 107, ¶ 13 , 237 A.3d 896 . [¶16] “A criminal defendant is entitled to present evidence in support of the contention that another is responsible for the crime with which he is charged.” State v. Dechaine, 572 A.2d 130, 134 (Me. 1990). 2021See State v. Proctor, 2020 ME 107, ¶ 13 , 237 A.3d 896 . [¶16] “A criminal defendant is entitled to present evidence in support of the contention that another is responsible for the crime with which he is charged.” State v. Dechaine, 572 A.2d 130, 134 (Me. 1990). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dechainegreen1 sentence2021See State v. Proctor, 2020 ME 107, ¶ 13 , 237 A.3d 896 . [¶16] “A criminal defendant is entitled to present evidence in support of the contention that another is responsible for the crime with which he is charged.” State v. Dechaine, 572 A.2d 130, 134 (Me. 1990). | 1 | 1 |
In re Child of James R.green2 sentences2019See In re Child of James R. , 2018 ME 50 , ¶ 16, 182 A.3d 1252 . [¶15] The child protection statutes provide that the petition for termination of parental rights "and the notice of hearing must be served on the parents and the guardian ad litem for the child at least 10 days prior to the hearing date," 5 and that "[s]ervice must be made in accordance with the District Court Civil Rules." 22 M.R.S. § 4053. 2019See In re Child of James R. , 2018 ME 50 , ¶ 16, 182 A.3d 1252 . [¶15] The child protection statutes provide that the petition for termination of parental rights "and the notice of hearing must be served on the parents and the guardian ad litem for the child at least 10 days prior to the hearing date," 5 and that "[s]ervice must be made in accordance with the District Court Civil Rules." 22 M.R.S. § 4053. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jonesgreen1 sentence1991M.R.Crim.P. 52; see also State v. Jones, 580 A.2d 161, 163 (Me.1990) (constitutional violation of rights protected by Confrontation Clause must be objected to at trial). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sullivan v. Porter
green
2 sentences2015Sullivan v. Porter, 2004 ME 134, ¶ 24 , 861 A.2d 625 . [¶ 13] An error is “obvious” if it is “(1) an error, (2) that is. plain, ... (3) that affects substantial rights[,] ... [and] (4) the error seriously affects the fairness and integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” State v. Pabon, 2011 ME 100, ¶ 29 , 28 A.3d 1147 . 2015Sullivan v. Porter, 2004 ME 134, ¶ 24 , 861 A.2d 625 . [¶ 13] An error is “obvious” if it is “(1) an error, (2) that is. plain, ... (3) that affects substantial rights[,] ... [and] (4) the error seriously affects the fairness and integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” State v. Pabon, 2011 ME 100, ¶ 29 , 28 A.3d 1147 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Pabon
green
2 sentences2015Sullivan v. Porter, 2004 ME 134, ¶ 24 , 861 A.2d 625 . [¶ 13] An error is “obvious” if it is “(1) an error, (2) that is. plain, ... (3) that affects substantial rights[,] ... [and] (4) the error seriously affects the fairness and integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” State v. Pabon, 2011 ME 100, ¶ 29 , 28 A.3d 1147 . 2015Sullivan v. Porter, 2004 ME 134, ¶ 24 , 861 A.2d 625 . [¶ 13] An error is “obvious” if it is “(1) an error, (2) that is. plain, ... (3) that affects substantial rights[,] ... [and] (4) the error seriously affects the fairness and integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” State v. Pabon, 2011 ME 100, ¶ 29 , 28 A.3d 1147 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re William S.
green
2 sentences2008In re William S., 2000 ME 34, ¶ 8 , 745 A.2d 991, 995 . 2008In re William S., 2000 ME 34, ¶ 8 , 745 A.2d 991, 995 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.