Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1967–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Magdich & Associates, PC v. Novi Development Associates LLC
green
2 sentences2017Id. 2017Id. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Haliw v. City of Sterling Heights
green
2 sentences2016We determine the intent of the court rule “from an examination of the court rule itself and its place within the structure of the Michigan Court Rules as a whole.” Haliw [v Sterling Hts], 471 Mich [700,] 706 [; 691 NW2d 753 (2005)]. [Lech, 310 Mich App at 261 .] II. 2015We determine the intent of the court rule “from an examination of the court rule itself and its place within the structure of the Michigan Court Rules as a whole.” Haliw, 471 Mich at 706 . | 2 | 2015–2016 |
Ronald W Lech II v. Huntmore Estates Condominium Association
green
1 sentence2026Id. (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Lech v. Huntmore Estates Condominium Association
neutral
1 sentence2016We determine the intent of the court rule “from an examination of the court rule itself and its place within the structure of the Michigan Court Rules as a whole.” Haliw [v Sterling Hts], 471 Mich [700,] 706 [; 691 NW2d 753 (2005)]. [Lech, 310 Mich App at 261 .] II. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Shotwell
green
2 sentences1978While I agree that a proceeding under an habitual offender statute, in this case MCL 769.11; MSA 28.1083, does not constitute a crime, and was adopted by the Legislature to increase the penalty for previous crimes, People v Shotwell, 352 Mich 42 ; 88 NW2d 313 (1958), cert den 356 US 976 ; 78 S Ct 1141 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1149 (1958), nevertheless, the intent of the court rule is clear to me. 1978While I agree that a proceeding under an habitual offender statute, in this case MCL 769.11; MSA 28.1083, does not constitute a crime, and was adopted by the Legislature to increase the penalty for previous crimes, People v Shotwell, 352 Mich 42 ; 88 NW2d 313 (1958), cert den 356 US 976 ; 78 S Ct 1141 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1149 (1958), nevertheless, the intent of the court rule is clear to me. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Sealy v. Department of Public Instruction
green
2 sentences1978While I agree that a proceeding under an habitual offender statute, in this case MCL 769.11; MSA 28.1083, does not constitute a crime, and was adopted by the Legislature to increase the penalty for previous crimes, People v Shotwell, 352 Mich 42 ; 88 NW2d 313 (1958), cert den 356 US 976 ; 78 S Ct 1141 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1149 (1958), nevertheless, the intent of the court rule is clear to me. 1978While I agree that a proceeding under an habitual offender statute, in this case MCL 769.11; MSA 28.1083, does not constitute a crime, and was adopted by the Legislature to increase the penalty for previous crimes, People v Shotwell, 352 Mich 42 ; 88 NW2d 313 (1958), cert den 356 US 976 ; 78 S Ct 1141 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1149 (1958), nevertheless, the intent of the court rule is clear to me. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Stover v. Farmers' Educational & Cooperative Union
green
2 sentences1978While I agree that a proceeding under an habitual offender statute, in this case MCL 769.11; MSA 28.1083, does not constitute a crime, and was adopted by the Legislature to increase the penalty for previous crimes, People v Shotwell, 352 Mich 42 ; 88 NW2d 313 (1958), cert den 356 US 976 ; 78 S Ct 1141 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1149 (1958), nevertheless, the intent of the court rule is clear to me. 1978While I agree that a proceeding under an habitual offender statute, in this case MCL 769.11; MSA 28.1083, does not constitute a crime, and was adopted by the Legislature to increase the penalty for previous crimes, People v Shotwell, 352 Mich 42 ; 88 NW2d 313 (1958), cert den 356 US 976 ; 78 S Ct 1141 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1149 (1958), nevertheless, the intent of the court rule is clear to me. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Daugherty v. Rhay
green
2 sentences1978While I agree that a proceeding under an habitual offender statute, in this case MCL 769.11; MSA 28.1083, does not constitute a crime, and was adopted by the Legislature to increase the penalty for previous crimes, People v Shotwell, 352 Mich 42 ; 88 NW2d 313 (1958), cert den 356 US 976 ; 78 S Ct 1141 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1149 (1958), nevertheless, the intent of the court rule is clear to me. 1978While I agree that a proceeding under an habitual offender statute, in this case MCL 769.11; MSA 28.1083, does not constitute a crime, and was adopted by the Legislature to increase the penalty for previous crimes, People v Shotwell, 352 Mich 42 ; 88 NW2d 313 (1958), cert den 356 US 976 ; 78 S Ct 1141 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1149 (1958), nevertheless, the intent of the court rule is clear to me. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Schwalk v. Schwalk
neutral
1 sentence1967Reardon v. Buck, supra; Schwalk v. Schwalk (1958), 352 Mich 383 ; Murchie v. Standard Oil Company (1959), 355 Mich 550 ; Hainault v. Vincent, supra. Last the defendant contends that the trial court was in error in allowing the plaintiff to proceed to take the divorce as a matter of default. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Hainault v. Vincent
green
1 sentence1967Reardon v. Buck, supra; Schwalk v. Schwalk (1958), 352 Mich 383 ; Murchie v. Standard Oil Company (1959), 355 Mich 550 ; Hainault v. Vincent, supra. Last the defendant contends that the trial court was in error in allowing the plaintiff to proceed to take the divorce as a matter of default. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Reardon v. Buck
green
1 sentence1967Reardon v. Buck, supra; Schwalk v. Schwalk (1958), 352 Mich 383 ; Murchie v. Standard Oil Company (1959), 355 Mich 550 ; Hainault v. Vincent, supra. Last the defendant contends that the trial court was in error in allowing the plaintiff to proceed to take the divorce as a matter of default. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Murchie v. Standard Oil Company
green
1 sentence1967Reardon v. Buck, supra; Schwalk v. Schwalk (1958), 352 Mich 383 ; Murchie v. Standard Oil Company (1959), 355 Mich 550 ; Hainault v. Vincent, supra. Last the defendant contends that the trial court was in error in allowing the plaintiff to proceed to take the divorce as a matter of default. | 1 | 1967–1967 |