Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lopezgreen2 sentences2016See State v. Lopez, 778 N.W.2d 700, 705 (Minn. 2010) (reviewing de novo whether defendant was required to register as predatory offender); State v. Patterson, 819 N.W.2d 462, 464 (Minn. App. 2012) (“Because resolution of [the issue of whether a defendant was required to register as a predatory offender] is based on interpretation of the offender- registration statute, the district court’s implicit determination that [defendant] is required to register as a predatory offender is subject to de novo review.”), review denied (Minn. Oct. 24, 2012). 2015Appellant relies primarily on State v. Lopez, where the supreme court determined that an offender’s controlled-substance conviction did not arise from the same set of circumstances as a later-dismissed kidnapping charge, precluding the predatory offender registration requirement. 778 N.W.2d 700, 706-07 (Minn. 2010). | 2 | 2 |
Kaiser v. Stategreen1 sentence2024See Kaiser v. State, 641 N.W.2d 900, 907 (Minn. 2002) (holding that the statutory duty to register as a predatory offender is a collateral consequence of a guilty plea because it is not part of defendant’s punishment). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Pattersongreen1 sentence2016See State v. Lopez, 778 N.W.2d 700, 705 (Minn. 2010) (reviewing de novo whether defendant was required to register as predatory offender); State v. Patterson, 819 N.W.2d 462, 464 (Minn. App. 2012) (“Because resolution of [the issue of whether a defendant was required to register as a predatory offender] is based on interpretation of the offender- registration statute, the district court’s implicit determination that [defendant] is required to register as a predatory offender is subject to de novo review.”), review denied (Minn. Oct. 24, 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Breeding v. Swensongreen2 sentences2016But habeas corpus “may not be used as a substitute for . . . [an] appeal; as a motion to correct, amend, or vacate; or as a cover for a collateral attack upon a judgment.” Breeding v. Swenson, 240 Minn. 93, 96 , 60 N.W.2d 4, 7 (1953). 2016But habeas corpus “may not be used as a substitute for . . . [an] appeal; as a motion to correct, amend, or vacate; or as a cover for a collateral attack upon a judgment.” Breeding v. Swenson, 240 Minn. 93, 96 , 60 N.W.2d 4, 7 (1953). | 1 | 1 |
Campos v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Finally, appellant relies on Campos v. State, 798 N.W.2d. 565, 568 (Minn. App. 2011), rev’d on other grounds by 816 N.W.2d 480 (Minn. 2012), and cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 938 (2013), to assert that Padilla overruled Kaiser. | 1 | 1 |
Longoria v. Stategreen1 sentence2008See Longoria v. State, 749 N.W.2d 104, 106-07 (Minn.App.2008), pet. for rev. filed (Minn. June 12, 2008). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rud v. Fabian
green
1 sentence2016Pollard, 878 N.W.2d at 343-44 ; Rud, 743 N.W.2d at 298 . 3 A. Challenge to Original Sentence Throughout his brief, Arradondo challenges the legality of his original sentence, specifically the ten-year conditional-release term and the predatory-offender-registration requirement. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State of Minnesota, ex rel., Branden Lee Pollard v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections
green
1 sentence2016Pollard, 878 N.W.2d at 343-44 ; Rud, 743 N.W.2d at 298 . 3 A. Challenge to Original Sentence Throughout his brief, Arradondo challenges the legality of his original sentence, specifically the ten-year conditional-release term and the predatory-offender-registration requirement. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Campos v. State
green
1 sentence2015Finally, appellant relies on Campos v. State, 798 N.W.2d. 565, 568 (Minn. App. 2011), rev’d on other grounds by 816 N.W.2d 480 (Minn. 2012), and cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 938 (2013), to assert that Padilla overruled Kaiser. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
McHenry v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County
neutral
1 sentence2015Finally, appellant relies on Campos v. State, 798 N.W.2d. 565, 568 (Minn. App. 2011), rev’d on other grounds by 816 N.W.2d 480 (Minn. 2012), and cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 938 (2013), to assert that Padilla overruled Kaiser. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Kaiser v. State
green
2 sentences2002Id. at 54 . 2002Id. at 54 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.