Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Edward Lowe Industries, Inc. v. Missouri Division of Employment Securitygreen2 sentences1997Sec., 865 S.W.2d 855, 863 (Mo.App.1993), and that our determination cannot be based merely on a numerical count of factors. 1997Edward Lowe Industries, Inc. v. Missouri Division of Employment Security, 865 S.W.2d 855, 863 (Mo.App.1993). | 2 | 2 |
K & D Auto Body, Inc. v. Division of Employment Securitygreen1 sentence2013K & D Auto Body, 171 S.W.3d at 112 (internal quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Klausner v. Brockmangreen2 sentences2005Klausner v. Brockman, 58 S.W.3d 671, 680 (Mo.App.2001). 2005Id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sloan v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.
green
1 sentence2013Sloan, 1 S.W.3d at 562-63 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid
green
2 sentences2005Two such additional factors, which were set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Community for Creative NonViolence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730, 109 S.Ct. 2166 , 104 L.Ed.2d 811 (1989), 2 are “(1) the provision of employee benefits, and (2) the tax treatment of the hired party.” Fritts, 992 S.W.2d at 385 (citing Reid, 490 U.S. at 751-52 , 109 S.Ct. at 2178-79 ). 2005Two such additional factors, which were set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Community for Creative NonViolence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730, 109 S.Ct. 2166 , 104 L.Ed.2d 811 (1989), 2 are “(1) the provision of employee benefits, and (2) the tax treatment of the hired party.” Fritts, 992 S.W.2d at 385 (citing Reid, 490 U.S. at 751-52 , 109 S.Ct. at 2178-79 ). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Maggio v. Lasalle Partners Asset Management, Ltd.
green
2 sentences2005Our analysis does not stop here, though, because the twenty factors discussed supra are simply “guides or aids in determining the nature of the employment relationship, and are not the only factors to consider.” Nat’l Heritage Enters., 164 S.W.3d at 167 . 2005Our analysis does not stop here, though, because the twenty factors discussed supra are simply “guides or aids in determining the nature of the employment relationship, and are not the only factors to consider.” Nat’l Heritage Enters., 164 S.W.3d at 167 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Fritts v. Williams
green
1 sentence2005Two such additional factors, which were set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Community for Creative NonViolence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730, 109 S.Ct. 2166 , 104 L.Ed.2d 811 (1989), 2 are “(1) the provision of employee benefits, and (2) the tax treatment of the hired party.” Fritts, 992 S.W.2d at 385 (citing Reid, 490 U.S. at 751-52 , 109 S.Ct. at 2178-79 ). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Stover Delivery System, Inc. v. Division of Employment Security
green
1 sentence2001These twenty factors have been consistently used as an aid for determining whether an individual is an employee or independent contractor under the common law rules, with “special scrutiny [] required in applying the twenty factors to assure that formalistic aspects of an arrangement designed to achieve a particular status do not obscure the substance of the arrangement.” Id. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.