Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Drake v. Stategreen2 sentences2010“The threshold question in a Miranda rights analysis is whether the defendant was in custody and being interrogated when the statement, in question was made.” Drake v. State, 800 So.2d 508, 513 (¶ 12) (Miss.2001). 2006Drake v. *26 State, 800 So.2d 508, 513 (Miss.2001). | 3 | 3 |
Miller v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Neither general on the scene questioning, nor voluntary statements made by a defendant are enough to trigger the requirements of Miranda." Miller v. State, 740 So.2d 858, 867 (Miss.1999) (citations omitted). 2000Neither general on the scene questioning, nor voluntary statements made by a defendant are enough to trigger the requirements of Miranda." Miller v. State, 740 So. 2d 858, 867 (Miss. 1999) (citations omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Hunt v. Stategreen2 sentences1999Greenlee, 725 So.2d at 825 (citing Hunt v. State, 687 So.2d 1154, 1159 (Miss.1996)). 1997Greenlee, 725 So. 2d at 825 (citing Hunt v. State, 687 So. 2d 1154, 1159 (Miss. 1996)). | 2 | 2 |
Keys v. Stategreen1 sentence2010To determine whether a person is considered to be “in custody[,]” we consider whether “a reasonable person would feel that they were going to jail and not just being temporarily detained.” Keys v. State, 963 So.2d 1193, 1197 (¶ 9) (Miss.Ct.App.2007) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Greenlee v. State
green
2 sentences1999Greenlee, 725 So.2d at 825 (citing Hunt v. State, 687 So.2d 1154, 1159 (Miss.1996)). 1997Greenlee, 725 So. 2d at 825 (citing Hunt v. State, 687 So. 2d 1154, 1159 (Miss. 1996)). | 2 | 1997–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.