Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Miss. Dept. of Correctionsgreen2 sentences2004In Johnson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections, 682 So.2d 367, 370 (Miss.1996), this Court held that under then Rule 20(b), "the EAB shall not alter the action taken by the agency, if the agency has acted in accordance with the published rule and if the personnel action taken by the agency is allowed under the guidelines." With the 1999 revisions, this rule is now State Personnel Board Rule 10.40.22(B), allowing: The Employee Appeals Board may modify an action of a responding agency but may not increase the severity of such action on the appealing party. 2003"Rule 20(b) mandates that the EAB shall not alter the action taken by the agency, if the agency has acted in accordance with the published rule and if the personnel action taken by the agency is allowed under the guidelines." Johnson v. MDOC, 682 So.2d 367, 370 (Miss.1996). | 5 | 6 |
Arnold Line Water Ass'n v. MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC SERVICEgreen2 sentences1999Arnold Line Water Ass'n, Inc. v. Mississippi Public Service Comm'n, 744 So.2d 246, 249 (Miss. 1999). ¶ 39. 1996Arnold Line Water Ass'n, Inc. v. Mississppi Public Service Comm'n, 1999 WL 161337, at *3 (Miss. | 2 | 2 |
Scott v. Young Womens Christian Ass'ngreen1 sentence1999The Johnson court stated that the EAB "shall not alter the action taken by the agency, if the agency has acted in accordance with the published rule and if the personnel action taken by the agency is allowed under the guidelines." Id. at 371. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.