Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2024Ct. App. 2020) (quoting Williams v. State, 752 So. 2d 410, 414 (¶13) (Miss. 2020“The purpose of an evidentiary hearing is for the court to receive evidence in order to make findings of fact.” Williams v. State, 752 So. 2d 410, 414 (¶13) (Miss. | 2 | 2 |
Milam v. Stategreen2 sentences1999The supreme court held in Milam v. State, 578 So.2d 272, 273 (Miss.1991), that if there are not any disputed or disputable facts, and the question is merely the interpretation of *3 statutes, no evidentiary hearing is required. ¶ 8. 1999The supreme court held in Milam v. State, 578 So.2d 272, 273 (Miss.1991), that if there are not any disputed or disputable facts, and the question is merely the interpretation of statutes, no evidentiary hearing is required. ¶ 14. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kenny Walton v. State of Mississippi
green
1 sentence2018This Court has held that "the purpose of an evidentiary hearing is for the court to receive evidence in order to make findings of fact." Walton v. State , 233 So.3d 909 , 912 (¶ 14) (Miss. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Rowland v. Britt
green
1 sentence2005"The purpose of an evidentiary hearing is for the court to receive evidence in order to make findings of fact." Rowland v. Britt, 867 So.2d 260 (¶ 9) (Miss. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Lyle v. State
green
1 sentence2003Lyle v. State, 756 So.2d 1 (¶ 7) (Miss.Ct.App.1999). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.