Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Corbin Russwin, Inc. v. Alexander's Hardware, Inc.green2 sentences2013In summary, “a forum selection clause designates the venue, a consent to jurisdiction clause waives personal jurisdiction and venue, and a choice of law clause designates the law to be applied.” Corbin Russwin, Inc. v. Alexander’s Hardware, Inc., 147 N.C. 2012In light of this precedent, this Court summarized the distinction: “[A] forum selection clause designates the venue, a consent to jurisdiction clause waives personal jurisdiction and venue, and a choice of law clause designates the law to be applied.” Corbin Russwin, Inc. v. Alexander’s Hardware, Inc., 147 N.C. | 3 | 3 |
Mark Group International, Inc. v. Stillgreen1 sentence2012See id. | 1 | 1 |
Patten Securities Corp., Inc. v. Diamond Greyhound & Genetics, Inc.green1 sentence1992See, e.g., Patten Sec. v. Diamond Greyhound & Genetics, Inc., 819 F.2d 400 (3d Cir. 1987) (describing a provision combining a choice of law clause and a consent to jurisdiction clause as a forum selection clause). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
EFCO Corp. v. Norman Highway Constructors, Inc.
green
1 sentence2019Id. ; EFCO Corp. v. Norman Highway Constructors, Inc. , 606 N.W.2d 297 , 300 (Iowa 2000). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Liberty Bank, F.S.B. v. Best Litho, Inc.
green
1 sentence2019Id. ; EFCO Corp. v. Norman Highway Constructors, Inc. , 606 N.W.2d 297 , 300 (Iowa 2000). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Johnston County v. R. N. Rouse & Co.
green
2 sentences1995Rouse & Co., 331 N.C. 88 , 414 S.E.2d 30 (1992), our Supreme Court held a consent to jurisdiction clause requiring the parties to submit to the jurisdiction of North Carolina courts did not conflict with a general arbitration clause, and therefore the county was bound to arbitrate the dispute. 1995Rouse & Co., 331 N.C. 88 , 414 S.E.2d 30 (1992), our Supreme Court held a consent to jurisdiction clause requiring the parties to submit to the jurisdiction of North Carolina courts did not conflict with a general arbitration clause, and therefore the county was bound to arbitrate the dispute. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Ruffin Woody & Associates, Inc. v. Person County
green
1 sentence1995This Court upheld an arbitration award in favor of a county where the county had sought arbitration under the terms of its contract with plaintiff in Ruffin Woody and Associates v. Person County, 92 N.C. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Bell Atlantic Tricon Leasing Corp. v. Johnnie's Garbage Service, Inc.
green
2 sentences1994App. 476 , 439 S.E.2d 221 (1994), this Court analyzed a consent to jurisdiction clause in a standardized lease agreement purporting to bind a North Carolina corporation to litigate in a New Jersey trial court. 1994Id. at 479 , 439 S.E.2d at 224 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.